I was wondering if you could unlock the Hulk page as I wish to clean it up in the Endgame sections. I understand you locked it because of an edit war, but if you are still concerned of that happening with the same users, I will put a protected tag on it so no one else edits it. Afterwards, you can do with it as you please. Does that sound good?
Greetings! So, I am aware of an issue where Spider-Man: Far From Home cannot show on the home screen thing. What if we did a Phase Three A and Phase Three B? 2016-2017 and 2018-2019, respectively, most likely. Solves the problem, I (and some other Discord users) think. Unless we're at the maximum number of... tabs, or whatnot?
Also suggesting possibly a section under "TV SERIES" for cancelled shows? Maybe? Like Ghost Rider, New Warriors, Damage Control, etc.
Also curious why Spider-Man 3, with an article and all, isn't under Phase Four.
EDIT: Since writing this, I've also noticed that the Eternals film article is titled as "The Eternals", despite there being no "The" anywhere in the logo. I think maybe we should change this? Same goes for the disambiguation page so the link still works and the title is written properly.
Hi! I just wanted to ask a question about the WandaVision page.
As you may already know by now, if you look cloesly at the shadow on the top-left corner of the promotional image of season 1, Vision's head has a noticable marking on his forehead, reminiscent of the Mind Stone. This could potentially just be left out of the series, appearing exclusively as a promotional easter egg, or could have some importance to the plot, but she we exclude the page from the Infinity stone appearances list? Just want to be certain.
On the page U.S. Agent, multiple editors seem to be going back and forth between concept art vs live action for the thumbnail image, including myself (but I'm pretty sure it's technically not an edit war because no one editor did an edit more than once, it was just one editor does something and then another steps in, etc., and I never undid anything). I'm just wondering whether it is more suitable to use the live action suit worn by the actor as seen in BTS or if concept art is more suitable until a non-BTS image. I have no preference but even if I did have one I thought I should come to you, as an Admin. I could not find an answer in the Manual of Style, but maybe I didn't look hard enough.
Hello Shabook, this user, whom you previously blocked for edit warring and advised them to read the MoS has been unblocked today and the first edit they make after they return, is to completely re-add the overdramatic paragraphs that they kept adding before that go against MoS and Neutral Point of View, I don't know if it's that they can't be bothered to care or what, but I don't know if they're going to stop.
Hello Shabook, there is a user who keeps edit warring on several pages with me. On Thor's page, all of his powers that he is granted through with er Stormbreaker of Mjolnir were underneath "Powers via ..." to show those powers were granted to him by said weapon/item. The same was done for Hulk and Iron Man with the Nano Gauntlet, and so it was recently also added to Thanos's page "With the Infinity Gauntlet replacing the Nano Gauntlet respectively). Well, said user had a problem with that because he/she didn't "like it" and they "didn't even notice it" and thought others "probably didn't as well", so that was clearly enough of a good reason to warrant mass removing it repeatedly. They are also very passive-aggressive and condescending and asked "what the point" of the titles were because he ASSUMED most people "wouldn't see them", as if that was a good enough reason to mass remove edits. I would like to get your opinion on the matter because clearly this user won't justify his reasoning with anything other than his personal opinions. () This isn't the first time this user edit warred because something went against their own personal preferences and not against MoS or formatting guide. The edit history of the Starforce uniform page can clearly show what I'm talking about. Here, they engaged in a prolonged edit war because they basically didn't like that 1 picture was off about one line from being inline with what THEY specifically wanted.
They constantly justify their edits wars with their own specifications and desires instead of judging revisions by the wiki's standards.
Yes, but in this case they're justification is because they specifically just didn't like it. My justification was that we've seen "powers via" used before and thus to be consistent, it should be used for other pages where it would be appropriate. I wanted to get your opinion on it first before doing anything else.