FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hey stop with the changes i am right you dumbass plus i know Cap far better than you ever can and just to point this out I am talking about Cap (Earth 19999) so don't try with me by talking about the less superiors ones (Earth 616 or Earth 1610) no gives a fuck about them you cunt so quite fucking up correct information 

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • MJLogan95. Please, look at the photo reference below to see it for yourself. The photo has high quality.

      Loading editor
    Shabook
    Shabook closed this thread because:
    Question solved
    18:33, September 29, 2019
  • Hey, just waning to inform you that all the images of the final battle in Endgame all have a watermark on them. If it is possible for you to find a version that does not, could you please replace them accordingly. Thanks.

      Loading editor
    • View all 32 replies
    • Found them.

        Loading editor
    • Bennyhef234 wrote:
      Found them.

      There's more, such as the Howard the Duck image. By the way, all images uploaded need to be in all respective galleries. So Wasp images also need to be Wasp Suit/Gallery, War Machine and/or Iron Man images need be in the gallery of whatever armor they have in that image. So those Morag War Machine images you uploaded would be in War Machine Armor: Mark VI/Gallery

      The Howard the Duck image you uploaded also has a Sling Ring Portal in the background, so Interdimensional Portal/Gallery is where they go :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey MJ, just wanted to explain why I was insistent about the prelude being canon after all. The reason I say this is because the subject of why the comic would be considered non canon-- Nebula's Arm-- is resolved in Avengers: Edngame. In Endgame, it is revealed that 2014 Nebula's "flesh" hand on her left arm is actually a cybernetic hand made to look like flesh. We see this when she time travels to 2023 to hack into the Avengers computer system, her left "flesh" hand extends its fingers and inserts itself into the ports to hack into it. I'm sorry for not explaining this earlier and edit warring over it, that's my bad, I remembered somewhere seeing her left hand being a cybernetic but couldn't remember from where until re-watching it. (Also, in your post above, you said that Nebula's left arm was flesh, but I'll assume you meant her hand instead and accidentally said arm) to also address the argument that Nebula specifically says Thanos "tore [her] arm from [her] body", this is probably referring to her right arm, which is also a cybernetic arm made to appear as flesh. We see this when Thanos tortures Nebula in Infinity War, since both of her arms are revealed to be cybernetic in that scene. Hope this cleared the confusion

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Sorry about that. I don't know how I didn't see that.

      Loading editor
  • I see that you have undone a recent edit of mine. I would like to talk about it, rather than participating in an editing war for which can occur so easily. Also, I would like if this interaction remained civil, not that I expect it to go such a way, but I don't want anyone to misinterpret anything that is said.

    So, I think we can agree that the deleted scene contradicts the original film, as the ending has Hill be the one who talks to the WSC, not Fury. Therefore, I didn't not include that scene (although I did alter the quote, believing it to be better then the one current one, as it has nothing to do with Hill). However, I did include one deleted scene moment where it is revealed that she reported to the WSC about Barton. As this is never seen, and doesn't interfere with the film, I thought it was alright to include, However, I am open to understanding if it is not.

    I hope you can be of assistance in this and clear up my confusion, and come to a conclusion we both understand.

    Cheers, Bennyhef234

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • Sorry, I may not have made my point clear. The scene itself is not canon, but she still could have been appointed the position. But, once again, I am not 100%, so it's also fair to just ignore it as well. I would say after all this that we ignore those deleted scenes.

        Loading editor
    • Yes, I concur we should. I don't believe she would have been appointed the position since it seemed to me like the Council only gave her that position in the deleted scenes because they wanted someone who followed their commands without question & Fury disobeyed them.

      But because she never spoke nor had explicit ties to them in the final cut, I don't think she would have been appointed. So yes, safe to say we ignore the Avengers deleted scenes regarding her.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Since the "Stealth Suit" was created by S.H.I.E.L.D., according to a promotional video, does this mean that Nick Fury, Maria Hill, and Seamstress should be listed as current members of the organization?

      Loading editor
    • I would say that Talos & Soren's crew is a part of S.H.I.E.L.D. but I'm not sure if it's up to me to say concretely. I would say that yes; Dimitri and Beck as well.

        Loading editor
    • Okay. Thanks.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey man, just messaging to stop a potential edit war.

    I totally agree with you, it's weird to have number of birthdays on a character's age. That's why I initially went with "biologically 16-17" because I thought "birthdays" would be laughed at despite being the facts. But that's the position we're in now.

    With calling both Peter and Flash 16 despite being biologically over 17.0 when you add it up from a decimal point of view, it seems that the MCU is taking the "easy" (though in my opinion more complicated) way of "you turn your next age on your next birthday". Peter was still 16 when he died in May 2018 and came back in October 2023, so won't turn 17 until his next birthday in August 2024. Yet he's biologically already 17.

    I personally feel a whole new system needs to be put in place for consistency with ages, but unfortunately Uskok never replied on that thread.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
      • sigh* we could have just left the ages the way they were a week ago...
        Loading editor
    • I think the wiki could've benefited from a reformatting of the age section entirely, and that this is if anything the only time that the age section has become important to the wiki. But I get removing it. Oh well.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi again.

    A few of us on the MCU Discord were having a dispute over Michelle's full name, since it was never confirmed. So I did some digging and found that in 2017, you made the edit to change her name without a source. As to why it ever stayed like that, idk, but do you have a source or reasoning for why the name was changed?

    https://marvelcinematicuniverse.fandom.com/wiki/Michelle_Jones?oldid=611453

      Loading editor
    • View all 9 replies
    • While I am still skeptical over the integrity of the name since it is a *recent source*, meaning that whoever wrote the article/edited the video got it from another website (likely this wikia, since we're the only site claiming it & prior to the video's release, there was no confirmation on her full name), I guess we'll just go off that source.

      If what I just said is true, then that means that "Dinowar10" inadvertently just made Michelle's full name canon off an editing fluke.

        Loading editor
    • Mister Explicit wrote:

      If what I just said is true, then that means that "Dinowar10" inadvertently just made Michelle's full name canon off an editing fluke.

      I have considered that as well... not sure how to feel about it :P

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi. I've uploaded a higher-quality image of File: SMFFH 4.jpg, but it is a PNG file. Is it possible for you to delete the JPG file?

      Loading editor
    • Compare

      SMFFH 4
      SMFFH 4
        Loading editor
    • Convert the .png to a .jpg

        Loading editor
    • Never mind; they were both your uploaded images & the .jpg is not featured anywere, so it's all good. I don't have the power to deleted photos, but add the Delete tag to the image & I'm sure one of the content mods or admins will get rid of it.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Bring Your MCU Movies Together