FANDOM

CaptainMagnum

aka Magnum

  • I live in The United States
  • I was born on March 24
  • My occupation is International hero for hire
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hey,

    I made a list of every user-placed (aside of the welcome messages) redlinks.

    On the list there are a few placed by you.

    Could you, when you have the time, edit those redlinks out.

    You can find the locations of the links here:

      Loading editor
  • Wikipedia's do not use first names in a articles unless there may be a discrepancy, like with the Stark's ( Howard and Tony) , in the same article. You did a lot of work on the Iron Monger Armor article, but you change all the last names to the unprofessional and familiar first name status...

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Would you care to tell me what was your source to change the creator of the Gamma Ray Projector?

      Loading editor
    • His source says Iron Man 2 DVD Extras, but I thought that Fitz said that the design came from Bruce Banner when he modified the stage lights in "The Only Light in the Darkness."…

        Loading editor
    • Nope, that was actually my source. I made that article, and added that the creator of that particular machine was Stark Industries, being the Iron Man 2 DVD Extras my source for that. But CaptainMagnum changed it as being created by Bruce Banner and Betty Ross.

      That change was made before the airing of that episode and had nothing to do with that. Besides the technology referenced by Fitz is not this Gamma Ray Projector, as Fitz talks about the Gamma Power Reserves of the Jump Jet.

      I just want to know his source for this change.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, I just looked it up. Talk later...

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • So you're attempting to tell me that in all three instances that I wrote in the transport plane article are quinjet. Then why aren't they in the quinjet article? Also why does a person call the jet from the Helicarrier in Avengers which I just watched for the fifth time and say, "Transport, you are unauthorized. Why are you approaching?" Before the Attack on the Helicarrier?…

      Loading editor
    • Avengers 1:09:30 : "Transport six-six-bravo. What is your mission. I do not have you on the day log. Copy?"

        Loading editor
    • Yes, all three of those instances involved a Quinjet. I'm not sure what page you're looking at, but all three of those instances, though not stated in quite the same way, are definitely part the history section on the Quinjet page. 

      Keep in mind that the article we have titled "Transport Plane" is referring to a specific model of aircraft, namely the one that has just recently begun appearing regularly in Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.. Don't get caught up in the name either, as I believe this is a temporary name given to that particular model of aircraft by a user at this site as a simple, specific way for us to keep up with the information/history of that aircraft until an official, or more suitable, name is possibly given in the future. 

      Also the Quinjet in that quote/example is being referred to as "transport" because its function is to transport things, like any vehicle. It was supposedly transporting personnel and supplies, so air traffic control would refer to it based on that, not by name or title.

        Loading editor
    • Well, it was called a "Jump Jet" in "Ragtag". Seems like this is all moot.

        Loading editor
    • Actually, the name "Transport Plane" was not just a placeholder, it came from dialogue from "T.A.H.I.T.I."

      "Three planes. A small transport to dock and a pair of F-35s to make sure we hand over Quinn"
      Grant Ward[src]

      However, it has been retconned since

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Man, I really don't understand your policy about many, many things... First with the Possible Entries on The Index that you kept deleting, and now with the categories on some Iron Man armors. Just tell how can it be that an article is can be in the item category from a specific film, but not in the general items category?

      Loading editor
    • It’s not necessarily an error to not have them in the general items category; rather it’s a technique to organize it in a manner that makes it easier overall for someone to find an item using the category. At this point it’s somewhat nonsensical how many Iron Man armors there are, and no matter which view you look at the category in, it makes the category more of a mess, or bigger than it could or needs to be, to have *ALL* of those iron man armors there. Should someone want to find something that is NOT an Iron Man Armor, then it quickly becomes redundant for the category to be littered with forty, slightly different versions of the one thing you are not looking for. By having most Iron Man armors limited to their own, dedicated sub-category (Category:Iron Man Armors), it becomes easy to find them if you specifically want to look them up, and they are still represented as items, but it also makes it much easier to see and investigate the wide variety of items that are not Iron Man armors using the main Items category.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Please, can you stop removing my links in the AoS articles? If you look a little carefully, I'm planning to create articles of the things that appear in the list of appearances, just as I've done with the Walkie-Talkie Wristwatch, Remote Beacon or Pick-Lock Device, just to mention a few. Thank you very much,

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • HaHa. I understand, I've noticed this wiki doesn't have the strictist or most clearly set out guide lines  as some do (or I haven't found any written out). I think everyone just tries to do what they think is best personally and the admins just make sure that the wiki doesn't burn down.

      I, personally, would work the tablets into the DWARF Drone article, because their cheif, and pretty much only purpose (that I've seen) is to act as their controlers.

      Also, for the Backscatter Glasses, I might also have worked that into the Eye Implant page, since they were directly made to mimic the exact functions of that device. But I could possibly go either way on that matter.

        Loading editor
    • IMO, some pages are there not so much as entries in and of themselves, but rather serve as supplementary material to larger pages. If Shabook hadn't made the entry on the walkie-talkie watch, I never would have realized that Coulson's page made no mention of his passion for antique collectables.

      It's one thing to just say "Coulson owns a a flying car, a two-way radio watch and a vintage set of cards", but it's much more effective to show such things.

      As I said, less important by themselves and more important as supplementary material.

      As for red links, I think that they are important. if you navigate through the "special pages" section and click on "Wanted Pages", you can see the pages with the most red-links, and therefore in the most need of creation. If there are no red links, then there is no way of knowing that the page is needed.

      http://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Special:WantedPages

      It's a helpful tool.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, welcome to Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Timeline page.

    Please leave me a message if I can help with anything!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+