Hey Benny! I did see your post on my wall this morning and saw the response for the administrator too. I understand the situation. If you wanted me to help, I would be open to it. If your team is good, then that’s fine too. Nothing personal. Thanks for the offer.
Hey! Sorry for any inconvenience, Marvelus and I still want you to be a moderator, nothing has changed there, it's only that we need to wait for an admin to approve it all and then promote you.
When I messaged you, it wasn't a promotion, but just to see if we did offer it to you, would you accept, so I would have an answer for the admin (but one of them misunderstood the situation as me promoting you).
However, I don't see a reason why they would reject our offer to add a new moderator, so if they end up accepting our request, then I'll be able to inform them.
KingArti, I removed your edits because Mark Ruffalo is not really confirmed in the show yet. This THR article is just reporting a panel from a Con where Ruffalo said he is in early talks to appear in She-Hulk. The character will likely appear in She-Hulk, but we can expect a "100% official confirmation" before adding the info to the articles.
"You are confident they used the Zune when they picked up Thor"
I corrected your Bruce Banner go Thor, but if you see my initial edit, I only said Tony used it in Endgame at the start. You added the rest, but that's still speculation. I gave the pick up Thor a pass because they were using the Benatar but we do not know that they used the Zune when building the machine. They could've been using anything else; the Internet, most likely. We shouldn't add speculation.
I completely agree. But, considering how there isn’t anything to say it wasn’t, but a good case that it could be, nor it really being that significant, I feel like it’s fine to include. However, if you’re still determined that it should not be added, that’s fine, I’ll accept that. Although, even though you see it as “speculation“, I believe that to be too strong of a word for something in regards to where music was coming from in a scene (which all instances occur with the Guardians, which would lead one to think it was from their Zune). So, it’s up to you, but I ask you consider adding it.
The way I see it, there is no main, secondary or tertiary antagonist of the Infinity Saga. It's a saga that has many focus points, but it's main focus is the Infinity Stones, not that it is one story with one main antagonist. Thanos was the main antagonist for Infinity War and Endgame, and that's it. Loki was the main antagonist for Thor and The Avengers. Each of those films had their own main and secondary antagonists. Even Whiplash was a main antagonist within the Infinity Saga. The only way there could be one main antagonist of the entire Infinity Saga, was if they were in ever film as the main antagonist.
well Thanos is the main villain of the saga because he's behind everything that's going on Loki is the secondary because he appears more than anyone else and he was an agent of Thanos but who would be the tertiary and the villains wiki says that Thanos is the main antagonist of the Infinity Saga and Loki is the secondary
Those parts are completely irrelevant to the character, as it's just a whole paragraph addressing how the Avengers were retrieving the stones because of the snap, so they traveled back in time etc. It's just unnecessary.
Also, I am doing it as Nerdtastic did so on the Hank Pym page.
I am doing it as Nerdtastic did so on the Hank Pym page.
Makes sense for that page, as the alt. Hank Pym was just there for the one scene & doesn't need the Avengers background info. However, upon deliberation, I will be restoring it to the Loki page, as the alternate timeline Loki is one we will be seeing a lot of in the future, and I think the page should have it listed how this alternate timeline came to be.
For characters like Hank Pym or Star-Lord, whose alternate timeline selves had a brief appearance & whom we will (most likely) never see again, simply having "alternative timeline" can suffice.
I would advise that you leave the Loki page. They should all be the same. Despite your reasoning, there is no reason why any of them need that unnecessary context. Whether it be one scene or something continuing into a series, it's all the same.
Take Jane Foster being fused with the Aether for an example: There is no need to write a whole paragraph about how it got there and that it involved a battle between the Asgardians and the Dark Elves, leading to Bor hiding it away. All it needs to say is what is relevant to Jane. Same with Loki. So, unless the context is told to him, it doesn't hold any relevance.
I don’t know. Doing the Simmons page was a lot, especially as I did it twice essentially. And the only reason I did I or even could do it was because I was rewatching the series, so I would have to do that again.
Besides, I was going to actually complete the Peggy Carter page next, then re do the Captain Marvel page, as well as expand the Hulk and Ant-Man Endgame stuff, so I don’t think I’ll get around to Fitz anytime soon.
Thanks anyway, I appreciate that you would want me to do it, and maybe I might, but as of anytime soon, probably not.
However, and this is up to you as well (and I don’t know your workload), but I would suggest that you should do it. I imagine the reason you want the Fitz page done is because that is the one you are interested in, so you should totally embrace that. But, up to you.
By the way, that website is insane! I just though it would some images of hm from the episodes, not literally every frame he’s in. If only there was that sort of website for Simmons, that would
Have made things a lot easier.
As you've still got an in use tag on the Jemma Simmons page I won't make the edit myself, so would you mind changing the Alternative Timeline section at the bottom of the biography part of the biography, as I've had to do for Enoch, Quake and Leo Fitz.
I'm actually get off now, but I too would like to know. It is very annoying. Although, I can understand why you may make that conclusion. However, I'm not really interested in the badges, that just happened to occur as well. Occasionally when I publish the edit and it changes all of it, a black bar appears up top and says something about an error, but I don't understand it. Hopefully when a do a full restart it will change.