@Hamo202 i believe they purposely wrote ikaris’ beautiful “ending” to be unknown so as to bring him back in the future if they need the character.
@Reawlybiwgtittimuncha honestly i don’t want to *itch over small details like that; it’s a great movie.
@Reawlybiwgtittimuncha it would have been better if Guang Bo had guided her to make the shot, telling her to relax and drop her shoulder before making it.
@Grapploct279 ah yes, i forgot about captain marvel. let’s remove her too. as for thor, i don’t really want to remove him as he’s one of the strongest OG 6 avengers, and he has his weaknesses, unlike captain marvel. so thor should stay, as he’s proven himself to have far more weaknesses (realistically) than captain marvel.
@Marvelus yes, i wouldn’t call vulture or mysterio super strong, but mysterio was a very well thought-out villian. he messed with tom psychologically, unlike most of the other villains, and hence, left a much deeper impact of hurt on him. every little action he made, from subtly snapping his fingers to brushing his face, every single action was planned to subconsciously alter peter’s (tom) perspective and subjugation. also, i feel like tom holland’s spider-man is the physically strongest spider-man out of the three, after rewatching all three spiderman sagas.
Can we remove wanda out of the equation, because that makes things really not fun. ok so, without wanda, who is the strongest avenger?
Leave your choices below!
Wenwu and Shang-Chi
Team thor
When sony comes to some agreement
So someone on reddit had this theory of ultron in What if:
And after thinking it through, I had a realisation about Age of Ultron (MCU, not necessarily What If.) hear me out.
His theory sounds like a good theory. but looking at how in the Eternals movie, they stated at the start that the celestials created the universe, and the six singularities along with it. the six singularities are the infinity stones. the stones were created by condensing the six parts upholding the fabric of the newly born universe. i have a theory that the mind stone reflects the celestials’ thoughts and judgement. Arishem has clearly been shown to be unhappy over the killing of the emerging celestial Tiamut on Earth, and he has stated that he would return and judge humanity. Arishem judges societies and deems them worthy or unworthy of living in a sense. so my theory is that Ultron reflects the mindset and “thoughts/judgement” of celestials who follow Arishem’s mindset. once Ultron was born out of the Mind Stone, he saw all of the data of human wars and conflict, then decided to judge humanity to be unworthy of living. which is eerily similar to what Arishem was saying. how’s this theory? leave your thoughts below!
@Heartz13 thank you! 😊
I have two theories about it:
The Titans are just regular extremely durable aliens from the planet Titan. They’re not eternals as far as we know as after seeing Thanos’ head chopped off, we can see that his physiology is not that of an eternal. So the MCU is going differently here. Unless the first titans were rogue eternals who created living alien life somehow, shaped into the early Titans. then the Titans copulated and have birth to more Titans. Following that logic, Eros could be an adopted eternal, essentially a “Titan”. but i don’t really support this part.
The second theory is that Eros is a Titan. the younger brother of Thanos, a Titan. there’s two possibilities: 1: He’s a Titan who gained eternal-like powers via cosmic energy, and hence became an eternal. or, 2: He’s the only known eternal in the MCU that isn’t an android, but a living being.
Seems like they’re looking to replace every OG avenger
Pip and luis should get their own spin off
Wait so, eros is the brother of thanos. but in the MCU, eros seems to be an eternal, and is still stated to be the brother of thanos. how does that work? is he an adoptive brother? because the eternals are essentially synthetic beings or androids in layman terms, so how does a synthetic being have blood relation to a titan? is eros somehow different?
@Grapploct279 it’s locked for me.
@Heartz13 no the wiki is wrong, and it’s not the same origin story. i tried to update it with updated information but it’s sadly locked.
@LR2159 it’s because it diverges from the usual marvel movie dogma, which some people aren’t so accepting to. imo i loved it.
@TurbulentLogician the IRL answer? RDJ’s contract was up and he didn’t want to continue. the in-universe answer? maybe because of one of the timelines in which doctor strange saw, he tried to revive iron man, but either the time stone wouldn’t allow it as tony’s death was an absolute point, or reviving tony would inadvertently mean something worse. maybe reviving tony would cause the avengers to settle down for a while after the battle, and try to come to terms with their losses and damage. after mourning deaths and regrouping, they may end up disagreeing over the stones. tony and bruce are likely to just want to return the stones to their timeline, while some others may want to use it to make things better, unintentionally further damaging the already-damaged fabric of reality within that universe. maybe doing so would cause more destruction as the team splits into three sides: Team A wants to return the stones, Team B wants to keep the stones here and/or use it to do something “good” first then return it, and Team C is neutral. this may spark an even worse civil war, or the stones may fall into another villian’s hands, further damaging the universe. these are just some possibilities i came up with.
@POWA14 agreed
@DieGrinsekatz77 mind giving us a rating over 10?