As much as it would be fun to start talking about the 2nd amendment, because any discussion in regards to it is absolutely hilarious, this is Fandom.
I may support feminism, but calling current day "feminism" actual feminism is an insult to what feminism is meant to be.
Does it need to be a female?
Well, Marc Spectre is technically considered crazy as well, so maybe Shia Labeouf isn't such a bad idea.
Moon Knight needs a TV show. It sure worked for Daredevil, it can work for Marc as well.
I do not plan to be seeing many MCU movies in the future. I might see Spider-Man Far From Home, mostly because a friend of mine is a big MCU Spider-Man fan, and Spider-Man fan in general, and while Spider-Man I may be my favorite Marvel character, I absolutely despise how they built "Spider-Man" in the MCU.
All this said, I might see Dr. Strange 2 and BP2, but I refuse to see GOTG3 after the mediocre GOTG2 and the fact that "what's it's name?" will be in the film. The only thing I'd see it for is if Adam Warlock is in the film as an important character.
Chloe Grace Moretz as Alison Blaire. Please, just give me my Alison Blaire portrayal already.
Hulk and Iron Man 2/3
Thanos pimp slapping Hulk and Drax. That Thanos vs Hulk fight did not satisfy me.
Knull will be retconned within a year or 2. And even then, he is a recent creation. At least a decade and then we'll talk.
@Crc you make a great point. Still, crime is crime, regardless of how understandable it is.
Peter was only in high school for, what? 30 issues? He was barely a teenager and was in his 20s by probably #100, and he certainly isn't meant to be portrayed as a sidekick. Only for the last 10-20 minutes of the Homecoming did he actually act like Spider-Man... Then there's Infinity War.
He was nowhere near the most accurate portrayal. That title will probably forever remain to Tobey Maguire, and I feel bad to say that because Tom Holland's acting is so good and I enjoyed his performance, regardless of how much I hated the portrayal.
I never said I hate Tom Holland. His performance was excellent. I just hate how the writers portrayed Spider-Man in the MCU.
As long as I can continue using my PS4 and I see that PlayStation 5 in a few then I'll be fine.
Anyways, an iStation? I wouldn't play that even for $1,000,000. That's how unappealing it sounds.
I'm aware of that. I was giving opinion on what should happen if the film rights revert to back to Marvel. Also, anything can be retconned. Have you seen the Halloween films and most recent one? They can easily retcon "MJ's" name, MCU Peter can be killed off and replaced, and the MCU would be better off for it. And I never implied a retcon for MCU Peter, I said that they should throw him on a bonfire and let him burn.
Anyways, I do hope Apple purchases Sony. Maybe they might run it better. Especially when it comes to their films and I will never have to see a Venom 2 film. I just hope they don't screw with the PlayStation department.
Hopefully as soon as Marvel gets the film rights to Spider-Man they fire everyone involved with Spider-Man Homecoming, with the exception of Tom Holland, kill MCU Peter off and transport an alternate universe Spider-Man into the MCU who has better writing, a better and more accurate character, make sure he isn't an Iron Man sidekick anymore, and move on. Also, maybe retcon the MCU's MJ. The name, and the character in general, pisses me off.
Disney bought Fox, therefore securing the rights to X-Men and possibly the F4(give me an Exiles film Marvel). The thing is that Sony would never give up the rights to Spider-Man films and they'd never sell out to Disney. Once again, Marvel's cluelessness in the 80s has come back to bite in the ass. Oh wait, Marvel was always clueless when it came to their characters... To this day.
Between the terrible and Black Panther level of noticeable CGI, the terrible comedy, and the disappointment that was Ghost, no. I did not like it.
None of the ones in the poll. We need something that hasn't been on screen before. Jackal could be a possibility if they ever decide they don't care, which they are probably already there judging by that Far From Home trailer description, and adapt the first part of the clone saga. I'd be fine with that... Maybe.
That said, Jackal(preferably not the Ben Reilly one, burn the Clone Conspiracy with fire), and Kraven would also be nice. But after the Venom film I know that Sony can't get Eddie Brock right, and I've grown tired of having the Green Goblin be the streamlined, main Spidey big baddy. Doctor Octopus/Doctor Octavious would be nice, but as I said, I want something that hasn't been in live action before, and I also want to see what Sony capable of when it comes to Spider-Man villains. Regardless, it's not like I'm going to see Far From Home in theatres. Nor it's sequel(hopefully which won't come to pass).
Are these their basic abilities or can Thor have Odinforce? Or can Wanda possess the ability to reality warp as she has show in the House of M storyline?
Regardless, if it's MCU, the Captain Marvel film hasn't been released yet.
Every single one of these characters have skills in all different categories. Some may not possess certain skill sets as the others, but they all possess just as many regardless. It doesn't matter how skilled Gamora or Black Widow is, it doesn't mean they have the potential to shatter an infinity gem or warp reality to what they want like Wanda can.
An all-rounder doesn't exist. Everyone is equal. No one is better than the other. We all have certain skills that some others don't possess, but those others have just as many skills that we don't possess as we have that they don't.