All posts by BEJT
@Prodigymaster112 I'm not sure I understand your point about how "Eid Mubarak" would change the date. The date is June 2025. The show has gone so far from something like May 22nd to June 8th.
https://marvelcinematicuniverse.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000003405133/r/4400000000011992668
They're just selling tickets for homecoming in September. It's a poster saying buy your tickets now, not a reminder that it's this week or anything.
(And to let people know, Sana Amanat confirmed it was 1-2 years after Endgame. Indeed, it's like 1.6 years.)
@ThatGuyNamedJoe The GRC is still a thing. If that detail were meant to make it a prequel to TFaTWS, that would've been made clear. But it's supposed to just be a background Easter egg that doesn't confuse people.
@Xandermcc The Tracksuit Mafia are still around. They weren't taken down in Hawkeye, just a group of them.
From the information I know about, Moon Knight should be April-May 2025.
https://marvelcinematicuniverse.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000003369830/r/4400000000011746020
But I know some people on the Timeline Discussion disagree, and I'm still catching up to find out why.
No, Disney+ doesn't do dates (fortunately), nor is its timeline reliable anyway. I don't know where you got the June/July thing from.
Sana Amanat has confirmed on Twitter that it is Greater Eid/Eid al-Adha in the show (June 2025) not Lesser Eid/Eid Al-Fitr (March 2025) which is the Eid that follows Ramadan.
The joke is that Bruno goes "It's Eid again?", like, "Wasn't it just Eid 2.5 months ago?" And that Kamala replies, "Yeah, the lesser one," to mean, "The less cool one that ironically is called the Greater one but I'm calling it the way it should be, the lesser one."
So to translate their conversation:
Bruno: "It's Eid again? Wasn't it just Eid 2.5 months ago?"
Kamala: "Yeah no that was the main Eid, now it's the less exciting one, the one ironically called "Greater", pfft, "lesser one" is more appropriate."
In a new interview with Empire (Spoiler Special Podcast, behind a paywall), 40 minutes in, Richie Palmer confirms: "To clarify that, too, Strange was never the Sorcerer Supreme. I think that after the Ancient One's demise in the first movie, I don't think anybody was clamouring for it, let alone Strange."
He then elaborates his own personal interpretation: "I think everybody in that world probably assumed it would be him, he was like, 'I got bigger fish to fry' [...] I think Strange was probably a little after-the-fact like, 'Oh dammit, I could've had that.'"
The Disney+ timeline is ludicrous at this point. It's utterly baffling.
The film takes place "a few months" (according to Sam Raimi) after No Way Home, which finishes just before Hawkeye in late 2024. So yes, it's Spring 2025, months after No Way Home and Hawkeye.
I am astonished by that ridiculous timeline.
I won't get into the specifics of *everything* I disagree with, but I will say I personally feel that's particularly harsh on Luke Cage, The Defenders, and C&D: Season 2.
Favourite returning main character: Sam Wilson.
Favourite returning character: Matt Murdock.
Favourite new character: Kate Bishop or Kamala Khan (honourable mentions to Mobius, Shang-Chi, Katy, America).
Favourite villain: Wenwu or Green Goblin.
MVP: Wong.
No, because they're just reports on what Feige said. They're not exclusives, just ordinary news articles. What Feige actually said is all that's relevant.
And what Feige actually just said is that he didn't have time to talk about their plans which include plans for mutants.
That doesn't have to mean a mutant-focused film (even if we all know it will happen), let alone specifically a film called The Mutants. Technically all he confirmed is that they have plans in place that involve mutant characters.
I don't have a problem with ordinary rereleases, I have a problem with the tactic of trying to lure people to pay for a whole film again just to see a few extra scenes.
As it happens, I'm not a big fan of this film which doesn't help, as it means I have no particular motive to go again other than the additional scenes.
It's only U.S. and Canada so far. They've said they'll announce more countries. I'm sure it will be in many countries.
Yes, as much as I disapprove of piracy I hope the scenes leak online for the reasons mentioned, since I kinda refuse to spend my money and time going again just for the sake of them which feels kinda manipulative and exploitative.
This feels quite cynical to me. If people want to go and watch it again, sure, but the trying to lure people with extra scenes is irritating to me. Particularly as someone who feels the need to see all of the MCU so feels the need to see those scenes, but does not want to pay the expensive price of a cinema ticket and take 3 hours out of my life just to see a few extra scenes they could have instead put on the Blu-ray.
I think the Ancient One is more referring to that film's use of the multiverse: different dimensions such as the Mirror Dimension, which she uses a Sling Ring to exit. Not different universes.
Additionally, the references on the timeline pages should explain many of the calculations.
I think when it feels again like they're welcoming of the full MCU fan-base, this could be lovely. Star Wars Celebration is lovely because it's so embracing of all degrees of Star Wars. The Marvel Television situation is too much of a barrier currently though, to me, as it feels like the event would be exclusionary towards some of the deepest MCU fans, like "We only care about what we made and you're only the target for attendance if you only care about what we made". I'm hoping that will continue to change though.
The Moon Knight team have talked about how the scheduling wasn't clear as they made it. For that reason, I don't think Marvel will have risked a connection between Moon Knight and Love and Thunder (in theory, also, Love and Thunder is set before Moon Knight), due to uncertain scheduling.
You can't source something that doesn't exist...
The point would be finding a source that she did say that - and she didn't.
Chloe has very much not said that.
It's six episodes, it couldn't be much shorter.
The First Avenger does technically chronologically come after The Incredible Hulk/Iron Man 2/Thor and before Avengers, just is 99% flashbacks to the 1940s. And The Incredible Hulk/Iron Man 2/Thor are essentially simultaneous, the fact that The Incredible Hulk should place after Iron Man 2 and Thor isn't too big a deal.
It's Guardians 2, Homecoming, Black Panther, Ant-Man and the Wasp, Captain Marvel, and so on when it properly/consistently kicked in for Marvel Studios.
Though they almost never tell any character's story out of chronological order interestingly, with very few exceptions (the returning characters in Captain Marvel but that's so distinctly a prequel, Black Widow in Black Widow). Keeps it understandable for audiences well, they can feel comfortable knowing when a character shows up, it's after the last thing you saw with them in.
This is an edit I made recently of all the MCU heroes who are Kate's age or under as of Spring 2025, the present MCU.
Billy and Tommy, Kid Loki, America, Cassie, Elijah, and Kate have all been Young Avengers in the comics.
Kamala and Riri (and the Miles Morales Spider-Man but not Peter Parker) have been Champions in the comics.
But also, of course, Daredevil and Jessica Jones had never been Defenders in the comics. So anyone could in theory be a candidate.
Explanation of the ages:
