I don’t mind the film still being a hulk psudeo sequel and from hearing it on paper it seems solid seeing did we forget that the origin of the hulk was cause of Ross trying to replicate the super soldier serum from 2008 Incredible Hulk. It really seems that the troubled production couldn’t quite overall be hopeful to actually valid general public.
I sort of understand the fans here of that film cause like Thor 4 on paper it’s a solid film but a big factor botched the potential there.
She could have at least appeared with her father on how her boyfriend destroyed Harlem back in The Incredible Hulk as part of the Sokovia Accords.
* Fortlev - Water tank and PVC pipe company (blue water tank)
* Gradiente - Electronic products company (antenna)
* Clube de Regatas do Flamengo - Football (or soccer for USA) club (monogram in the red and black flag)
Since The Incredible Hulk is on Disney+, Does that mean Disney now have the power to make Hulk movies without Universal Pictures involvement.
I like how the vfx artists added the detail of the hair on his face.
I heard the Incredible Hulk was reworked from a sequel to the 2003 hulk, was it true? If so that explains the opening sequence being a summary and similar starting location to where 2003 ended.
Also how does it feel that marvel and lucasfilm collaborated on Howard the duck.
What is the situation in Japan, specifically, because I heard they have all the Spider-Verse films before 2021, and all the infinity saga films, including the two spider man films and even the hulk. Is it still true for all the information mentioned?
At the bottom of the picture.
It says in the Captain America: New World Order Wikipedia article that Liv Tyler will be reprising her role as Betty Ross in the former. I can't tell if this is accurate or not since there was no announcement saying the Liv Tyler will be appearing in New World Order as her The Incredible Hulk character Betty Ross. It was April Fools Day a day ago, so I can't tell at all if this is a fake or not. Back in 2020, Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield were added to the Spider-Man: No Way Home Wikipedia and Google Cast sections, but were removed later on due to the information not being accurate until No Way Home's release. Can someone please tell me if this information is accurate or not because Captain America: New World Order seems to be more of a Hulk movie than a Captain America movie, like if this is accurate, New World Order will be featuring 3 characters who are more associated with Bruce Banner/Hulk than with Sam Wilson/Captain America.
Is this true or not?
When Bruce jumps off to transform but fails, did you remember his first time when he did it with a helicopter? Also, the lego set has it as a play feature.
How come the scene with Tony counts as a post credit scene, I know the style and way it is executed means that it is its purpose, yet it comes immediately after the intended ending, and before any closing credits.
As unlikely as it probably is, since it's been almost fifteen years now since The Incredible Hulk was released, with Harrison Ford succeeding William Hurt as General "Thunderbolt" Ross, I'd like to see Betty return as well. Given how long it's been since that film's release, something tells me that she'd likely be recast if she was to return, but would anyone like to see Liv Tyler come back as Betty? Just a thought.
I have a theory that the incredible hulk takes place in a seperate universe
My proof:
1. Appearence of Bruce Banner/Hulk
2. Abomination looks different from what we see in Shang-Chi and She-Hulk
3. Bruce likes Betty, yet in the Avengers movies he doesn't bring her up and is in love with Natasha.
4. In the final scene Tony Stark is onboard with the Avengers Initiative which would mean iron man 2 doesn't make sense.
I know it's a bit TOO early to be talking about Captain America: New World Order, but the one thing I hope Marvel doesn't ruin in New World Order is Samuel Sterns/The Leader.
Now I'm not sure if anyone or anybody agrees with this, but I like Abomination's design in Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings and She-Hulk: Attorney at Law than his design in The Incredible Hulk. Abomination and the Leader are Hulk villains, but unlike the former in which they used in a Hulk-related production, the latter is instead in a Captain America movie. I don't know why they decided to do this, but hey, at least Samuel Sterns/Mr. Blue/The Leader is coming back in a Marvel Cinematic Universe production since we last saw him in The Incredible Hulk.
Now back to topic. Your all probably wondering what I mean by "how will Marvel ruin The Leader?" Well let's just say that Marvel better not make the Leader ugly-looking and/or not comic accurate like DC and Warner Bros. did with Hector Hammond in Green Lantern because Hammond's design looked TERRIBLE and HORRIBLE in that movie. Let's hope Marvel doesn't do anything wrong with the Leader's design because at this point, The Leader is New World Order's selling point for fans to watch the fourth Captain America movie in 1 or 2 years.
How was Disney able to include The Incredible Hulk in the box set? I thought Universal retained distribution rights.
When I noticed the Hulk movie from 2008 isn’t in Disney+ even tho it’s part MCU, how come?
I have seen every single movie and show in the MCU execpt The Incredible Hulk. is it worth watching, or should it remain forgotten.
Do you think it would be possible that Marvel Studios reveals the movie The Incredible Hulk (2008) takes place in a parallel universe to the main MCU universe? Let me explain: the physical of Bruce Banner has changed (change of actor from Edward Norton to Mark Ruffalo), Hulk physical, color, size and force have changed, the history of the movie has absolutely no impact on the MCU, and apart from the emergence of Thunderbolt Ross and Emil Blonsky recently (besides the physical of the Abomination has also changed a lot since the Incredible Hulk) and a stealth appearance of Ironman, there is no actor found back in the MCU. It may well be that in this alternate universe there is also a variant of Ironman, General Ross and Blonsky. Also we never saw Betty Ross and Samuel Sterns, which I think had to have originally the suite of his character.
I would love that Marvel Studios says it and finally make the connection and the full integration of this film that deserves more consideration and an appropriate sequel.
What do you think ?
It's going on fourteen years now since The Incredible Hulk, the second M.C.U. film entry, hit theaters, and outside of the role he's had to play as an Avenger and with Thor and now She-Hulk coming up soon, we haven't seen much of him since. This may be due in no small part to Marvel's strained relationship with Universal, who not only distributed the old show with Lou Ferrigno and Bill Bixby and the debacle from '03 with Eric Bana, but also operated the first Marvel attractions in theme parks prior to Disney's acquisition. Does anyone else here think that Mark Ruffalo's Hulk solo film is overdue? Or do you think that it's not worth saving due to the studios' refusal to listen to reason?
