It basically was an Avengers movie. Calling it "Captain America: Civil War" was a bit of a stretch.

"basically was an Avengers movie"? to me an Avengers movie would be heroes fighting against pretty much just one antagonist; Loki in 1st Avengers, Ultron in 2nd Avengers, Thanos in 3rd & 4th.

in Civil War, there seemed to be more fighting against each other than fighting against any other antagonist. perhaps some fighting against each other in the movies titled Avengers, but seemingly not as much as in Civil War.

It should be renamed Avengers Civil War lol

I mean it is an Avengers movie but it is also a Captain America movie so basically if they didn’t have Captain America part of the title there won’t be any difference

@Mdsb759 Civil War had most of the OG6 Avengers except for Banner and Odinson, I'll think all of the New Avengers, and some of the Accords/Rogue Avengers in Spidey and Black Panther. It was basically Avengers 2.5

Plus, they spend almost as much time trying to figure out how to fight Zemo/Crossbones just as much as they were fighting themselves. It's like not calling Endgame a Avengers movie just cause 2014 Thanos was in for like a half hour max.