Don't understand the hate towards the movie, NWH was only good because of the cameos and had a bad story while this had a good story and bad cameos, like yall care more for the cameos than the actual story? Yes it has flaws but not everything will be Infinity War 2.0.

@Phonthegamer What was so bad about No way Home?

The basic storyline lol. Could go more in depth, but the hole Peter Parker storyline as a hole in the third movie was mediocre, not bad but mediocre.

I personally think it's one of marvel's best spider-man movies, after the whole Raimi trilogy, but we can agree to disagree.

Like yeah it was better than the first 2 lol. We share that opinion atleast

I really liked the film! I think iI like it more than No Way Home. The visuals were amazing and it had a really creepy vibe, which I enjoyed. I also liked Wanda's villain arc. She was terrifying in this one but I like that at the end she was redeemed after they explained she was corrupted by the Darkhold.

The movie should of been 3hrs tho, a lot more depth was needed in the Illuminati and Strange himself! Would of liked more calm storyline and less rush rush storylines.

@Phonthegamer No Way Home wasn't "only good because of the cameos", because they're not cameos. The only characters you could remove from the film are Sandman, Lizard and Venom. If you removed any of the others, there would be no movie. They are an essential part of the plot, and they all change Peter's life in one way or the other. They served a purpose for the plot, unlike the Illuminati who literally just appeared to get killed off.

Does it rely a little too much on nostalgia? Yeah, pretty much. But it wasn't only good because of the cameos, because they weren't even cameos to begin with.

I would give it a 6.5 or 7/10.

It felt rushed but had cool horror aspects.

Wanda learnt nothing after Westview