Alright guys. Wondering your opinion on the debate between Steve and Tonys view concerning the Sokovia Accords. Who was right who was wrong. Why?
Alright guys. Wondering your opinion on the debate between Steve and Tonys view concerning the Sokovia Accords. Who was right who was wrong. Why?
I love all you guys’s points on this post. Thank you fr for being so insightful
@Brett3801 Exactly... I suppose Iron Man would be called to intervene in the New York invasion of the Black Order anyway, Iron Man just anticipated any permission he would have required, so I assume he would be ok with it.
Which is exactly why the Accords are pointless. If Tony and Peter are allowed to just do that anyway, what's the point of them?
For safety of logic
But it's illogical. Tony had to break the law in order to save the day, so why have the law there? It's just a hindrance.
Laws are meant to be broken anyway
I mean, they're not. Laws are designed to be followed, that's why we have them.
But they wouldn't make them if nobody broke rules
What? Laws are the rules that people break. You can't break a nonexistent rule.
Exactly laws are meant to be broken
What do you think?