@captainamerica066 Steve should’ve explained to tony the situation with Bucky in more depth. But then again tony should’ve had a lil more trust in Steve.

So it’s like you said. Selfish.

We'll by the second half of the film, they weren't actually fighting over the Accords. Steve disagreed with them, but as we saw, he decided to retire, along with Sam. So, if the whole Zemo/Bucky situation didn't happen, there wouldn't have been a problem (or at least not a fight between the Avengers). However, there just would have been something else that would have pulled Steve back in, so I guess the same thing would have happened.

I think captain America was right

WRT the Accords, I thought Cap’s arguments were a bit better. However, both Cap & Iron Man handled the situation poorly. As Black Panther said, vengeance had consumed them by the end of Civil War. By the end of Civil War, Black Panther was the only 1 who was acting rationally.

@WoundedDefector highly agreed. Great argument thank you.

Ngl, I stand for the Accords. In a realistic stand point, if I was a human citizen in the MCU universe, I would like to know that people and governments are attempting to control all of these superheroes, instead of having to be at the superhero's mercy and judgement.

Iron Man followed the law.

I was Team Cap first time watching, but as I began to understand more about the film, I'm not really very sure.

I was with team Tony @Tuffhead1234

I was team cap but anyway