Thread:Uskok/@comment-6127681-20151012192632/@comment-6127681-20151012210039

The protection policy protects against fanon, vandalism, and edit warring, none of which I am guilty of. I said so myself, in good faith, I did not change Raza's status from "deceased" to "unknown" after my initial attempt was redacted out of respect for the debate. Look at the edit history. I made one edit; it was redacted; and though I disagreed (which is why i initiated the debate on your page); I left it be for the duration of the debate. The article was in no danger from me as evidenced by the fact that I didn't "damage" it while I could've. Check the edit history: there was NO edit warring, my position is NOT fanon, and i was NOT vandalizing. Which makes the protection you placed on the article not only frustrating but in violation of policy. And that's fine if you no longer want to talk to me; that's why I requested Uskok's mediation and didn't continue the discussion on your page via another post to your message wall.

And it is not a minor issue; it's representative of the larger double standard that's laced throughout this wiki. Under your own criteria, why is Abu Bakar allowed to be listed as "Status: Unknown"? His case is extremely similar to Raza's. Why are other people's edits about Raza on Ten Rings related pages allowed to remain when they too suggest his fate is ambiguous? This is about double standards and accuracy.