Thread:Shabook/@comment-1509585-20141206082711/@comment-112155-20141206230134

Yes, I Heard you, this is very simple. I'm talking about one thing, and you're talking about another.

Yes, I wrote those information, and yes I know that it was "speculation" (though the way it was redacted never assured it was a fact). I wrote that MONTHS ago, when the standards of this wiki were still a "work-in-progress", and many things were allowed.

You cite the Layout Guide as a reason to remove it. Do you mean the same Layout Guide I personally wrote and one of the admins said it was basically as worthy as wooden dollar coin? (though he used a set of more disgusting words).

Honestly, I didn't question the validity of the information presented in the article until today and, though you've been trying to say otherwise, I've never said you weren't right. But I guess noticing that didn't help your reasons.

If you're going to strictly apply the Layout Guide, then you should probably look around the timeline pages, because they are probably the pages with the highest amount of unsourced information.