Thread:Shabook/@comment-3164086-20141217065819/@comment-3164086-20141230060928

One section per edit is what I DID the first time, I did not intertwine events, the ONLY casual language I used was the misuse of "Cap" for Captain America, and the ONLY factual inaccuracy was to leave out a two-line exchange between Pierce and Fury. Fixing these mistakes or, lo and behold! asking me to fix them myself, would have taken about as much time as the reversion, except the end result would have been a stellar section of an article instead of the same grammatical errors and the two of us butting heads.

My mistakes were much more numerous the second time around, but that was because I tried to fix the grammatical errors the entire page. Clearly, however, you would prefer an article that is constantly interrupted by glaring grievous grammatical abominations than one that reads smoothly, albeit the use of no more than five instances of casual language and disagreements with style by intertwining events. Both are wrong. One of them is an improvement that follows the English language.

And for the record, the ONLY time that I can seem to find when I incorrectly wrote an account of an event involving the Triskelion (because I REWATCHED THE MOVIE while rewriting the article to ensure accuracy) was to leave out the conversation of the bullet between Pierce and Fury, and I do apologize for that, as yeah, it was wrong. You may note that my second, article-wide edit includes this event.

- Master Tej -