Thread:BEJT/@comment-27496405-20180729214349/@comment-26838855-20190106003426

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Notes
Marvelus wrote: Yeah, I saw you fixed it.

Not need to thank me ;), this is a group work. We all have to do our parts of the little homework. I also wrote Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. S5 2091 events. I finished the Season and loved it. Very well written and you can see the love the writers have for these characters. Marvelus wrote: About my description from my edit, you misunderstood it. There are some drafts events left (your notes) that are not in the 2017 page. It means it needs more writing, unless I am getting confused. Either way, I am so sorry. I'm still not sure what exactly you're referring to. And don't apologise!

Jessica Jones Notes
Marvelus wrote: I am so sorry about that brother, didn't mean to cause you stress or something. Yeah I realized, I thought I had written Episode 2 but I put Season, my bad. Will never happen again. I will leave those thing for you and just focus on the Present Day events. No worries, I was just mentioning it now just because I thought it was worth mentioning to help my stress levels a bit.

Marvelus wrote: Again, I am sorry. What is OCD? o.O Obsessive compulsive disorder. It's actually a mental disorder where you have compulsions to act a certain way to deal with obsessive thoughts you struggle with, though it's often used to describe in general when people are obsessive over correct format and layout and details and thoroughness.

Marvelus wrote: Also, watching Jessica Jones S2 for the third time I noticed that I can narrow it down a lot and make it brief, concise and direct just like the events of Daredevil S1 at the 2015 article. And I would be pleased to know if it is okay I am good at brevity in order to make the 2017 article more fluid as it has a lot of events in it. So you only check it and add a few more things you can but not write a lot. It might help to move faster and have Season 2 done before we get Season 3 and finale season of the Netflix's installments.

What do you say? I don't intend on adding content to your writing except for when it's necessary for improving flow. If you've found a good way to write every scene succinctly, fantastic! Thank you and well done.

Images/References
Marvelus wrote: Sure, I will do it, but not now. While collaborating at Blog de Superheroes I found a way to put pictures in the Wikia articles in order to reduce the excess of them, too many pictures are across the articles and I think I may have exceeded on that. I will start checking from Before 20th Century to the last Timeline articles, soon. However, I am planning for this. No worries, I feel bad asking you specifically to do a task, I just think you're better than me at it. Didn't expect it to be a bigger task than just adding some images for the new content, sorry.

Marvelus wrote: I have had a lot of difficulties on my life last year and neglected several things that are important for my future. I left all the Social Media (I am very sure you saw Elledy92's message on my wall) and focused on myself. I am fine now, and next week I will start studying a lot among other things: GYM, dance and driving lessons, study hard for the subjects in my University and prepare myself mentally. I tell you this because I trsut in you and consider you my friend, even tho I don't know your name but you know mine xD, well I am planning to edit here in the wikia on my Saturday's nights and my entire Sunday (unless something comes up), that is why this last few days I have started writting and doing everything I can in here as I catch up with the MCU products. On March I will have more free time until I start again with my studies, however, on March I will be more available to continue with the writings-up.

So Saturday's night (unless something gets on my way), Sunday (for sure) and first 3 weeks of March I will focus entirely in the Wikia to help and that kind of things. Awesome. Good to know you're in a better place and that you have more time in your life.

Marvelus wrote: I am also thinking on adding pictures to some of the references, I have received some "complaints" that are very difficult to look into due to the amount of information, so in order to make it more fluid I was thinking on adding images as well in order to make it easier. And I love the idea it might help a lot. Complaints? Can I see them?

The references aren't final. They were a rushed job from all of us. All the timeline pages are messy and I intend to comb through them all in fine detail this year to make sure they're all up to scratch. That will include improving the layout of the references. They're not in their final form. So much of what we do on the timeline is, "This isn't quite perfect but it's better than it was before," and that's the case with the references. They're far from perfect and the system isn't correct throughout, but having them there is better than nothing and this was the best we could do in a hurry.

As for images, I'm not entirely opposed to the idea. After all, if you look at my "8 years later" blog, I used them. But they cannot mess up the spacing of the " " s/new lines like they did from these first edits - instead of adding to fluidity, it made it messy and randomly broken up. As well as this, a) I don't know if it goes against the policies, and b) the only images that really make sense to go there are ones with evidence in them, and not just like pictures of Ted Allpress. Those images currently, where I could, are linked to rather than shown, which achieves pretty much the same thing. But I do agree that small images, done correctly, with the evidence shown in them, could look nice. Though I wouldn't rush to doing that right now.

Marvelus wrote: I will start checking the images from the articles, beginning from Before 20th Century. Marvelus wrote: Finished Before 20th Century article. How does it look? I am very proud of how it is, specially the References section which is now more fluid and easy to read. Marvelus wrote: Done up to 1940s article A few other points I found:
 * I don't really get why you make certain date text in the articles bold. There's no reason for them to be bold, they're just part of the text in the article.
 * Was there a particular reason you were removing the "**" parts of events in the pages and putting them all back under just one single bullet point? You were the person who decided to start doing the event name followed by ** breakdowns of the event if it was a long event so I don't really get why you're undoing that now. I don't particularly have a problem either way although I did quite like your idea with the "**" s. Was it just for some of them, where you felt they weren't big enough events to justify more than just the one bullet point?
 * The inclusion of quotes in the references is a reasonably good idea. That seems to fit fine within policy and not affect the formatting too much. Though the whole quote about the "firstborn" isn't necessary for example, just the relevant part. But good idea.

Creel vs. Murdock
Marvelus wrote: Also I have this for you to check for the Daredevil S1 placement. Thank you! I've been meaning to get around to changing that.