Thread:BEJT/@comment-27496405-20170830154244/@comment-26838855-20171015211122

Maurice.136 wrote: Good point. Er just a quick question out of curiosity, how come all the years in 2000s up to 2010 doesn't have separate articles? Established before I arrived here, but it makes sense. 2001-2007 really don't need individual articles, there's not enough content, it would feel bloated. "2000s" is easier, like with the previous decades.