Thread:Shabook/@comment-25999669-20180102173054/@comment-112155-20180102231219

Hi Nerdtastic, I hope you enjoyed your holidays too!

1. Well, that's a subtle difference, but one that manages to be easily explained within the current Category Tree.

IMO, main problems with the categories "running wild" (and it's seen every time someone tries to make a category out of thin air) are speculating who would be there, and the lack of maintenance that will surely happen. And as people tend to use the "And then why that thing over there is allowed and my fantastic idea isn't?" argument, I try to contain as much as I could categories that can lead to the justification of less "relevant" categories.

So, yes, proceed whenever you want with this.

2. Not entirely sure with this. Superhuman longevity is, after all, a superpower that, in most cases, is a part of the characteristic physiological traits of a species. I see the categorization problem explained above.

3. Let me run a test, because FANDOM terms and conditions state that the history of an article must be preserved to grant every user acknowledgement of their contributions. So deleting an article and then just recreating it in one edit would make appear as if everything was added at once by the same editor.

So this would need a deletion, a copypaste, then a restoration of the article. And that may work, or maybe it won't, and would leave the gallery in exactly the same place.

I'll test it with Shocker's gallery, and see if it takes some time to update the cache of the wiki, or if it's simply not possible.