Thread:Marvelous 345678/@comment-27496405-20180723185324/@comment-3095612-20180924225814

BEJT wrote: I wonder if G.W. Bridge might be a Fox character, because there was some speculation that Terry Crews was playing him in Deadpool 2 (it turned out to actually be Bedlam, but I wonder if the people who speculated it had checked and found out that he was a Fox character). If he is, he can't be director. But anyway, yeah, I wonder who it is - it would be nice to know the full list of S.H.I.E.L.D. directors, and there is a gap between the founders and Fury, where we don't know. It could maybe even be Talos - I saw somewhere that he is Fury's boss, so it's possible he's the director. Peggy would be in her 70s, she'd probably have retired - at least retired being a director. But maybe not. Pierce was in his 70s and still held a job as authoritative as director of S.H.I.E.L.D., and Peggy's resilient and hardworking. Yeah, the only reason I mentioned Bridge was he was referenced in one of those memos about Howard Stark's death in Winter Soldier when Zola was stalling Steve and Natasha in the old bunker. I figured Bridge might be one of those 'shared characters' between studios. I totally down for a list of directors. I'm still curious about the hierarchy - since Hill was referred to as Commander once or twice, Pierce was a Secretary, Mitchell Carson was Head of Defense.. etc. We need like a SHIELD Handbook, lol. As for Talos, I've been speculating he's Deputy Chief, that title Fury had before Pierce appointed him Director, or middle management. But yeah, who knows, since Talos is impersonating whoever this person is.

BEJT wrote: Ah OK cool thanks, I'm assuming they got that info from Marvel. Sounds overall like maybe 1995. A bit later than expected but cool. It's not the "early" '90s like Feige initially said (1995 is actually in the second half of the decade, as New Year 1994-1995 is the midpoint of the decade), but it does actually fit with the "25 years" statement because as I explained in July, technically the wording of that statement would, when calculated, suggest around early 1995. It's just that Feige's comment probably wasn't as thought-through as its technical meeting, so the 25 years mention was likely just a slight overstatement. I guess by 2019 thought it will be 24 years, so it's close enough. It's a fluid process, so when Feige commented 90s, they were probably still cementing the time frame of the movie. And now in 2018, they must have thinned it to mid '90s.

BEJT wrote: As mentioned above, I don't think that Sokovia itself means it has to be pre-Age of Ultron, but I think that the evidence just happens to place it earlier than Age of Ultron anyway. Agreed. But ugh, they had to be so vague! lol.

BEJT wrote: Maybe Daredevil: Season 4 or 5, as Mrmichaelt said. You never know. I think she's a Daredevil character in the comics? And if they have no The Defenders plans at the moment, it would be nice to do more small crossovers. Yeah, I associate her more with Daredevil but I can understand they want to spend some time developing Mary and not have her meet with a while with DD to avoid a similar sub-plot with Elektra.