Thread:Shabook/@comment-25179360-20171231221247/@comment-112155-20180102224946

I'm extremely sorry if you don't like having rules to improve the quality of the wiki and prefer to do whatever you want for the sake of a "creative environment". There are plenty of wikis like that, but I'm afraid that this wiki is not, and will never be as long as I'm around.

I'm very proud of the policies that have made this wiki to be considered, and I quote, as a "tight ship with little to no everyday problems", and an aspiring goal for other smaller or newer communities.

If that all doesn't match with your concept of what a wikia should be and you like the Wikipedia model, then perhaps you should be editing there instead. And if editors like to consider themselves above the rules, then those are not the kind of editors this wiki needs and wants. Quality over quantity.

And I will probably continue not spending time in explaining over and over why conjecture and speculation gets removed from our articles as soon as it is noticed. For every editor that gets "offended" for their wrong edits getting undone, is the rightful editor that gets "ofended" for edits being added that downgrade this wiki's quality. If I have to advocate for one of the two kind of editors, I have zero doubts who I would choose.