Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26838855-20190803131136/@comment-3095612-20191103054311

BEJT wrote: Marvel released a video on their YouTube channel a few hours ago as well where they say it's set after Endgame, but that doesn't necessarily translate to canon, the same way all those Iron Man comics are set "between Iron Man and Iron Man 2" but aren't canon.

If they acknowledge and explain Hulk's appearance, and/or someone actually properly addresses the canon question and says yes, sure. It would be annoying because so many people, myself included, cannot access it, and it's messy in terms of what exact elements of a variable story count as canon and it being a new medium... but sure.

But due to Hulk and the article saying it pretty much isn't really canon, I would say it's non-canon until proven otherwise, rather than canon until proven otherwise. Yes, A:DC is probably going to be in the same vein as those non-canon 'inspired by' comics without the official red stamp on the cover.

BEJT wrote:

Peter Parker 16, Again (additional)
In the latest The Daily Bugle video shows an article, which isn't actually the article on the site, which also calls Peter a "sixteen-year-old". Sigh...

BEJT wrote: Again, would like some more input on this to make a decision. I was trying to re-read all the old posts and I think I'm just confusing myself. What was the original problem again and/or why does Endgame have to shift from October 2023 to a later date?