Thread:Shabook/@comment-25179360-20171231221247/@comment-25179360-20180101024445

To be honest, I believe all reverts should have an explanation behind them. Especially in regards to something as poorly defined and ambiguous as "speculation". Speaking of which, I'm failing to understand why it's considered speculative in the first place. We know Tina Minoru explained the Staff was indeed nanotechnology, and that the Kamar Taj wizards use supernatural magic for their pursuits. Since the Wiki acknowledges the woman in Doctor Strange was Minoru, that means she used a piece of technology while in a society that practices traditional magic.

None of that is conjecture. Everything stated can be cited by in-universe dialogue & culture, still, I'm not particularly attached to that edit and won't add it back again.

But I would like to say this isn't the first time an edit of mine has been reverted without any explanation given, and it kills my motivation to actually help edit these pages. I know I make mistakes sometimes and don't mind damage control, but I doubt anyone on here likes when edits they worked on are seemingly undone for no rhyme or reason.