Thread:Twillight2/@comment-27496405-20190314174414/@comment-24126800-20190318170220

Ye, get to the cenzors. That's your only hope, Coward Of False Statements.

Your source of information is an uncanon, out of movies useless crap. I see no contradictions within the movies themselves, thank you very much. If the exo-source contradicts the movies, that source is useless. Got it?

The actual timeline stated within the movies for Iron Man1 is: 36 hours before kidnapping, 3 months captivity, than the whole of the movie happens in May. So that 9 month is gibberish nonsense, some comics-writer has to go to canon-camp.

Iron Man 2 is pretty much undefined when happens exactly, we only know it ends on Dec. 25 of some year, and it happens after Avengers 1, the chitori invasion. We only know the year is 2010+, from Captain America First Avenger.

Deleted scenes are NOT CANON, they are removed from the film, THEY ARE LIKE DO NOT EVEN EXIST. Refering a trashed element is nonsense.

Let's see what supports your theory: "Marvel's official timeline" is exo-canon source, thus irrelevant. Staff saying some nonsense in interviews: irrelevant, especialy after the Right Handed Infinity Gauntlet, thank you very much. Agent's of Shield is a spinoff show from some non-Disney company, which isn't even allowed to reference the movies, thus it is like sourcing one of the Fantastic Four movies - nonsense. The movies beat all other sources either way naturaly, so if anything contradicts the movies, that information is false.

Age of Ultron has a picture with a date - that implies when the picture was made, nothing else. Only proves, AoU happened at least that time, and we know thathappened in 2015 (most likely, it's a bit of a limbo there). For Battle of Gulmira YOUR OWN SOURCE CONTRADICTS YOU, as the picture is from 2010, while the wikia (falsly) states it happened in 2009 (based on nothing, naturaly).

Calling your attention that only the post-credit scene of Incredible Hulk happens where you claim the 2nd half of it happened. Unfortunately for you, the rest of your argument here relies on some comicbook, what is secondary material, thus trumpeted by the movies, so I don't care.

Iron Man 2 actually starts in 1963 (Anton dissidates). The start of the movie is where Ivan makes himself a reactor, and 6 months pass until we get to the Expo/Senate-jurying. The rest of the movie naturaly don't take much more time. Unfortunately for you, the Monaco Incident does not appear inside the movies, thus if a secondary source causes contraditcion, it is eliminated as source.

I don't think I have to go further, as your problem is clear: you don't watch the movies, and take secondary, or even tertiary sources as precedent, while the movies are the core of the MCU, not some garbage outside of them, and even some movies (starting with Spiderman Homecoming, but there are different problems in other movies too, like Thor Dark World vs Age of Ultron, Iron Man 3 vs Age of Ultron, Black Panther vs Civil War, Age of Ultron vs 3 other sources, Winter Soldier vs Captain Marvel) have their own problem, so we don't need more.

My postition is: the movies beat everything. Related Disney film materials are secondary sources. Disney-comics are tertiary sources. Licenced film products are fourth grade evidence. Licenced other materials are 5th degree evidence. Other "official" Disney-materials (like timeline) are 6th degree evidence. Anything other (like directors/actors/writers interviews) are only 7th degree evidence. Deleted scenes are NOTHING.

Clear?