Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1031724-20161117042801/@comment-25521424-20161117103418

KillRoy231 wrote:

First, the whole Sokovia Accords thing. Yes, people died during the Avengers' fights with some of the enemies, some of which might have been unintentionally caused by the Avengers themselves. Yet if they weren't there, more people would have died, and there would have been more destruction.

Especially New York, no one has any right accusing them for damage and deaths caused there because the World Security Council was going to blow up New York and everyone in it with a nuclear bomb. And Iron Man saved what was left of New York by sending the warhead through the portal to blow up the Chitauri mothership. The Avengers aren't perfect but they are the best chance at minimizing civilian casualties. That's the all point of the movie, how is that ridicolous? The Avengers are a private organization with unlimited power, and after the fall of S.H.I.E.L.D., they answer only themselves.

Sure, they saved millions of lives, but the cost of their actions is not only economical but also social. What if an Avengers went rogue? Or create something dangerous (Ultron)? The all point of the Accords is on having the superhumans or the vigilantes under control to keep an eye of them and prevent of doing something that will hurt the population.

It is a compromise, and there is not really a right or wrong argument, just points of views.