Thread:CirUmeUela/@comment-27496405-20180307074410/@comment-26838855-20180507144645

Marvelous 345678 wrote: Great!, also, why don't we put Ragnarok onto December 2017? That doesn't sit well with me. I mean, it has to be before December 4th, but also with the many many references to it being 2 years since Age of Ultron, both from the film and numerous cast and crew, I don't think it should be later than November 5th, because as of November 6th it becomes 2.5 years since he turned into the Hulk and while it's still possible because it's only 2 calendar years, the sheer number of times we were told "2 years" makes me feel like it should still also round to 2 years mathematically, even if that's 2.49 years.

Feige's comment doesn't mean it can't be November, he was just saying it's not necessarily the case that it's in real time - but I feel like placing it in early November makes it look just like a real time placement, and that would go against Feige's anti-real time comment. If evidence placed it in late November I feel like that works fine with Feige's comment, but early November, not so much. Might as well move it back a few days into late October.

I feel like late October works nicely. Plus, it was filmed in August, December is very different weather-wise from August.