Thread:Rodangizzardcrusher3/@comment-26687285-20160822213306/@comment-26687285-20161129231731

Rodangizzardcrusher3 wrote: I suppose. Which is more dangerous in your opinion? Well, the dangers at Hogwarts are definitely alot creepier and more primal than those faced by the Xavier's lot (BTW i'm looking at the X-Men in isolation, removed from the rest of the Marvel world). I know i'd rather face a group of soldiers armed with stundarts or a funky looking demi-god than a giant monstrous snake or a legion of 6 foot freaking spiders!. And even though mansion has been destroyed more times than Hogwarts its smaller size makes easier to reconstruct (as seen in Apocalypse) than a castle that's roughly 40 kilometers in size. Yikes!.

On the other hand, while Charles's mansion is a nice and quiet place to live and study it's not nearly as mysterious, wonderous and entrawling as Hogwarts. The most outlandish thing they have there is a secret basement with a high-tech jetplane, some shiny electronic doors and an epcot mind-machine (wich only a handfull of people can actually use). Sure, the danger room would be fun to try, but Hogwarts is almost begging to be explored. You could probably spend decades scouring that place and still find something new every day. And while, yes, the student deathtoll is alot higher with Potter, the idea of living there is just so exciting. The X-Mansion gives you a place to hide from the rest of the world. Hogwarts is a whole other world in and of itself.