Thread:Marvelus/@comment-27496405-20190519011243/@comment-26838855-20190626212443

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.: Season 6 (Edward Zachary Sunrose)
Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: Also, the last episode of AoS (no spoilers) Simmons says that Coulson was sick for "a long time", which could hopefully give us some leeway in extending the timeline between December 2017 and the Snap in mid-2018. All caught up now. Yes, that was a helpful line.

Also, Mrmichaelt mentioned before about Sarge being 100. I thought I'd just add that having seen the episode, I think the reason he doesn't look 100 is given in the line before, about being on planets that move close to the speed of light. That would create a time dilation effect.

Doesn't explain how he was born around 1919 yet is some sort of alternate version of a man born in 1964, but I don't think he's some sort of alien with slow ageing. He could still be some sort of alternate human.

Geekritique (TheVultureKnight, Marvelus, ProBot1227, Edward Zachary Sunrose)
TheVultureKnight wrote: I don't know if you have seen this already, but a youtube channel named Geekritique has made a series of videos explaining the placement of each MCU film. He also made other videos showing the timeline (there are some differences between his timeline and yours, like placing Iron Man in 2008 and Cloak & Dagger in 2015).

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8hiDAKjraT9ExpGJLmdUjJEaw_iSficf

https://youtu.be/vONWz696THw I try to avoid all of that stuff because I just get really stressed seeing them.

Marvelus wrote: Didn't he get based off our work? Well, having Iron Man in 2008 is not okay, and even worse having Cloak & Dagger S1 in 2015 when there is a crossover with the Runaways (potentially) on their way. You're thinking of New Rockstars.

ProBot1227 wrote: Nah, Vision and Happy placed the film in 2008. Can't really disagree with someone like Happy. The strange thing about that Happy line is it doesn't even place Iron Man in 2008, it places Iron Man 2 in 2008 (people seem to forget Tony and Pepper didn't get together until Iron Man 2), which is just weird (though if you believe that Spider-Man: Homecoming is in fact functioning off some weird plan with "8 years later", Iron Man 2 would indeed have to be 2008).

Marvelus wrote: 2009 is the confirmed year for Iron Man. Not 2008 Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: Actually, he's done all of the work on his timeline independently from our timeline. I mentioned a few videos ago in his comments that we would probably be a great resource for his next timeline, and he said he'd heard of our timeline before but hadn't ever really taken a good look at it.

Since then, he decided to start from scratch, doing that series of short videos placing each movie.

I enjoy Dakota's timeline videos and him and Jen are just the cutest, so I don't mind if their timeline isn't perfect. At the end of the day, as long as the chronological order is correct, that's all we can hope for until Marvel Studios comes out with a date-by-date timeline. I doubt Marvel will ever come out with a date-by-date timeline, just a more complex one akin to the 2012 one, and never including the TV shows.

Marvelus wrote: Hmm then I made a mistake confusing them Yeah I think you're thinking of the New Rockstars videos.