Thread:CirUmeUela/@comment-27496405-20180307074410/@comment-26838855-20180426164444

Elledy92 wrote: 1500 years old. That's what it says. That will make him far younger than Loki. Well, 1500 makes sense as a rounded figure. If he's thinking, "Well, I was born a bit over 1000 years ago, but 2 calendar millennia ago, 1500".

I noticed rewatching Thor: Ragnarok today (the final one in my chronological film rewatch) that when Thor finishes telling the snake story, he says "... and he stabbed me. We were 8 at the time." This suggests Thor and Loki are less than a year apart in age, because at some point they e, which makes sense because traditionally in the comics - and this has been written on the wiki, though I don't know that it's actually been confirmed to be a canon thing in the MCU - Asgardians age at a normal human rate until adulthood, before slowing down, and we see in Thor a time when both Loki and Thor are 10-11, suggesting again that they were born at about the same time.

I actually did some calculations a while back, here, and will update them at some point with the fact that Thor and Loki are actually less than a year apart, any probable shift of Thor: Ragnarok and new info from Avengers: Infinity War, but I calculated that they probably age at normal rate to about 19.5 then age at about one 97.6th of the speed of a human from then on.