Thread:TomasDerksen/@comment-996391-20140503064102/@comment-212.22.37.22-20140504155446

I don't understand this. If something happens, or is mentioned to have happened in a city, then the article about the city should cover it.

Then, the article about the state should cover every event that happens or is mentioned to have happened in every city of that state.

Then, the article about the country should cover every event that happens or is mentioned to have happened in every state of that country.

And finally, the article about the continent should cover every event that happens or is mentioned to have happened in every country of that continent.

What's the problema with having articles about locations not explicitlly mentioned when a location that belongs to it is mentioned?