Thread:Uskok/@comment-6127681-20151012192632/@comment-6127681-20151013163240

I have read all the policies and rules... That's why I keep quoting them. And while Uskok's point about Stane having to be stupid to leave Raza alive is an excellent point, I have to remind us of our policy on conjecture: "This does not preclude, however, deductions based on canon facts or basic common sense, as long as they are clearly presented as such and never construed as confirmed canon." So it's not about what's likely or logical, but what's confirmed. Putting Raza's status as "deceased" implies to a person who's read our policies but not seen the first Iron Man that Raza is confirmed dead, when he is not. This is about policy and accuracy. I've quoted that exact part of the "Conjecture" article before. And yes, Shabook, you should have let the three-revert rule apply. I wasn't damaging the article as I've said before. That's why I was so offended, because I wasn't violating any policies and I felt punished for not doing anything wrong. And I am hoping for an answer pertaining to a question I've asked before, which I'll quote here again: "Under your own criteria, why is Abu Bakar allowed to be listed as 'Status: Unknown'? His case is extremely similar to Raza's. Why are other people's edits about Raza on Ten Rings related pages allowed to remain when they too suggest his fate is ambiguous?". If you guys could answer that question for me that'd be great.