Thread:BEJT/@comment-27496405-20170830154244/@comment-26838855-20170831011011

CirUmeUela wrote: No problem! I've been reading through the timeline a lot for a couple years now and I've been wanting to put together a chronological edit for a while now. I read that blog posting of yours, so is that the official placement for stuff now on the timeline here? I know you guys are ignoring the 8 Years Later thing because it makes no sense, but does that have any effect at all with the new placements? Avengers is still 2012 and Civil War and Homecoming in 2016, but does it change anything else?

The Black Widow flashback didn't exactly have a placement on the timeline. What I saw was a mention of Natasha getting training in the Red Room, dated 1995. The source was a comic. But I can move that to early 2000s. I guess I will have to give it an arbirary date, like 2002 or something, since I don't have any other clues for an exact year.

I also noticed that the Hulk stuff wasn't listed chronologically in the timeline, according to comics and stuff. But I'm not gonna worry about the comics too much except for when they provide clues for dates. So for simplicity, I left the Hulk stuff in chronological order. I did change things in a few spots, but I agree with you guys for like 95% of stuff.

As for Fury's Big Week, no need to check the timecodes for exactness. Does Fury's Big Week stay the same except for moving it back a year or two? Because that's an easy fix if that's the case. Yup, it's the same, just a year earlier. The 8 years cannot work at all, and it does not really affect the new worked out timeline for Phase One, it is only a tiny piece of evidence listed among the many bits.