Thread:Shabook/@comment-3164086-20141217065819/@comment-112155-20141230063515

Let's see...

With your first edit, you edited the section "Destruction of the Triskelion", and your edit had so many mistakes, maybe not gramar mistakes, but it made the article so unfaithful to the events of the movie that had to be undone, as I already explained in the first comment of this whole thread.

Of course, I prefer a well structured and faithful article with a few (or whatever the number) grammar mistakes that can be easily fixed once spotted (as many other editors do) than changing it with that excuse into an unfaithful and unclear article lacking any consistence with the rest of 4133 articles of the wiki. And that's the main reason your second edit was reverted too...

Honestly, I don't get the point of this whole discussion now, as I already explained some of the numerous mistakes you did. You say you are so concerned about the gramar of the article, but instead of fixing it, as I did with the "runned" example you provided, you seem to be more interested in justifying your edits than in fixing all those mistakes...