Thread:Marvelous 345678/@comment-26838855-20170701032609/@comment-26838855-20170825221939

It's weird because Jon Watts and Kevin Feige also recently said things pertaining to Spider-Man which contradicted it. Feige implied (although this cannot quite work, maximum really is 2.5 years) that there were 3-5 years between "I am Iron Man" and the Battle of New York in a statement about how old Peter Parker was during certain events, and Jon Watts reaffirmed on the day of the U.K. release that Peter was 8 at "I am Iron Man", when we know he's 15 in Spider-Man: Homecoming, which fits as 7 years between those date with "I am Iron Man" in November 2009, not 9/10+ years, as implied by the "8 years later".

Absolutely zero outside of that card backs it up anywhere. Even if it was a misguided, ignoring the TV shows, attempt to fix the Vision "8 years" line in Civil War, then it would be "6 years later", and even with all these articles trying to "fix" it, none of them can justify 8 years, with them all saying 2010 to 2017. It's such a weird mistake, because there is absolutely no basis anywhere for it. I hope it continues to have nothing that matches up with it.