Thread:Contributor7/@comment-6127681-20151029223621/@comment-27132068-20151030171419

So I've scrolled through your and his message walls and I see that Shabook is definitely one of those admins who believe they are always right despite being as deluded and biased as most comic book fanboys. It's not necessarily a bad thing, but what he does is against general wiki policies.

And sup with this: " Policies don't have, and don't need, "sources", so I guess you have misunderstood the whole reasons to undo your edits."

 How in the world don't policies about fictional not-owned-by-Shabook content don't need sources? Lol. They contain information about another's intellectual  property. If they had sources there would be much less controversies.

 He says that he proves our arguments wrong with reasoning and then locks the thread, but when I've started providing solid evidence on my newly generated arguments, he just proceeded to "debate" with his old, repetitive and meaningless explanations. You know, as if he didn't even bother reading mine. And then he just stopped replying. I guess he couldn't invent any more of them. I don't blame him for this, but why can't he just agree with me and admit that he was wrong? He wasn't able to deny a single fact I presented.