Thread:Uskok/@comment-26838855-20190426235345/@comment-26838855-20190430070410

MJLogan95 wrote: I don't think we should have "years alive" It should be "chronological" (referring to years since birth) and "biological" (their physical age)

I think for stuff like Runaways, maybe we could have ex. 16 (as of 2018) or something similar "Chronological" and "years alive", as I tried to demonstrate with the Winter Soldier, are technically different ages. "Years alive" for most characters would be the same as their biological age, whereas "chronological" (which I don't think describes the phenomenon we're trying to get at but it'll do) would be the whole "date minus date of birth" thing. When it comes to Bucky, "years alive" and biological age would be different, because he's been alive for 100-101 years, whereas is biologically 30-34. Meanwhile, he's 105-106 if you do date minus date of birth.