Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-112155-20160412195430/@comment-25521424-20160414170643

Greater good wrote: Elledy92 wrote: Greater good wrote: Elledy92 wrote: I thought that Hive looked great. Didn't have any problem with the CGI: it's a comicbook TV shows, CGI doesn't have to be realistic. It does have to look realistic if it is to be believable. Look at how convincing the animals in the new Jungle Book movie look:

http://static.rogerebert.com/uploads/review/primary_image/reviews/the-jungle-book-2016/hero_The-Jungle-Book-2016.jpg

Then compare it to how ridiculously cartoonish Bebop and Rocksteady look in the new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movie:

http://screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-out-shadows-bebop-rocksteady.jpg

The quality of the CGI makes a big difference. They both look great in my opinion. And i think the animal of The Jungle Book will be the one who will look outdated pretty quicky in the near future.

Personally, i have more problem with the makeover of the serie, sometimes, than the CGI. Hive, for what we saw, looked pretty good compared to Lash or "Mister Hyde". Raina and Gordon however were very good. Bebop and Rocksteady already look outdated. They look like 2004 CGI.

I also disagree with you about The Jungle Book. That's some of the best CGI that has ever been put to film. I disagree, they looks very cartoony but also very detailed and polished. They're perfect for the kind of movie they are in.

The Jungle Book characters looks very good now, my only issues is that i'm pretty sure they'll look outdated soon.

And yeah, i don't have any  idea why they put that awful dog monstruosity in Sherlock, it looks bad and it was unnecesary (you could materialized Henry Knight's fear just with the use of some shady practical effects).