Thread:BEJT/@comment-27496405-20180729214349/@comment-26838855-20190114230600

Marvelus wrote: Will answer on Sunday.

[https://readcomicsonline.ru/comic/marvels-avengers-untitled-prelude-2018/2/14 Avengers: Endgame Prelude #2 confirms six years have passed between Avengers and Avengers: Infinity War. Now it is explictly with the indication of how many years linked to the movie] remember that a few people on the Internet said that Stark was referring to the time since Age of Ultron or Iron Man 3... So. On their faces. Nice! I hadn't read the Endgame Prelude yet because it wasn't high priority since it was just an adaptation, so thank you for letting me know.

I mean there was never any doubt, but if anyone ever suggests that to us (I've never actually seen people saying that but if they do), we have about as explicit a reference as possible. It literally asterisks it to say it's referring to The Avengers😂.

Marvelus wrote: Hi man, sorry for the late response.

About JJ Season 2 write ups, I will be able to edit next Sunday, so I will try to finish writting the season. Right on time for Season 3 coming soon. Not bothered at all about it taking a while for you to reply - I take a while to reply as well. We're all busy.

You've been really helpful even just these last couple of weeks, if you stopped now and never did any more it would have been helpful, I'm not expecting anything from you, anything you do is just a great bonus.

If you're wondering why my write-ups slowed down again, I've had exams and other assignments. After tomorrow, though, I'll be pretty much done, so I can get back to working quite a bit on here again.

Marvelus wrote: I will reassume my task to add the images about the same time of my writting ups. 😉 Thanks, man. When I mentioned it, I didn't mean to burden you with a big task, I just thought it was worth mentioning that there were sections without images. Don't stress over it or anything.

Marvelus wrote: I think you know about the complaints too. I saw it on Facebook (months ago, when I had one) when someone recommended this Wiki's timeline and other one replied saying that it was hard to read the references for the amount of references listed and how they might work. I felt a lit disappointed that you took down the image because (at least) I think they help to improve the "flow"... I remembered days afo and thought that it was time to do it better, maybe? I don't remember that but OK.

Sorry, I felt bad because I knew you liked it, but I had to remove them just because it was messy and broken up and there were some unnecessary images and it just felt like it wasn't ready. As well as this, I didn't know if it was allowed by policy. Like I said though, not ruling out images in the references, just not the way it was done initially.

Marvelus wrote: Huh, I didn't know the references were on their final form. So we have a lot of work to do with the references, writting ups and all those several books of Doctor Strange I have seen being added in the last few days ans that comic called Doctor Strange 0 from Japan. Meh, we always have loads of work to do. It's on my extensive to-do list.

I assumed those Doctor Strange things being added were just merchandise things like sticker books, like you get for all the films.

And Doctor Strange: Episode 0 is non-canon.

Marvelus wrote: I was removing the ** parts from the 1940s to see how they worked. I mean, I split some events that work better when they are from the same text and are not split up cuz of the **. The 1940s is not done yet. I will revisit it and work on it before moving on to 1950s etc etc etc. I see. I wasn't complaining or anything, was just curious.