Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5037384-20160511173932/@comment-25521424-20161018214518

SwitzerlandSoccer wrote:

Elledy92 wrote:

Hugues de Payens wrote: SwitzerlandSoccer wrote: Elledy92 wrote: SwitzerlandSoccer wrote:

DinoSlider wrote:

Draft227 wrote:

DinoSlider wrote: Robert Downey Jr. => 51

Brie Larson => 27

Yes, Stark is a playboy billionaire, but he should stick to Pepper Potts or May Parker ... But what does age have to do with love? As long as the younger person isn't a child or a minor a sexual relationship between them is possible. In real life, sure. But we aren't talking about love, we are talking about what we want to see in a movie. My personal opinion is that there is way too much emphasis on "love interests" in these movies anyway. In my opinion, the whole Cap-Winter Soldier relationship was useless. Winter Soldier did never anything good for Cap. In Civil War it was also stupid. The only thing I liked was that Winter Soldier killed Stark's parents. That made it a little understandable. What? Bucky was Cap's best friend from the 40s, they had a 10 years frendship before WWII. It was totally understandable why they did what they did. For me it wasn't understandable. I understand why that they were friends, but if your friend wants to kill you, he isn't your friend anymore. What does this have to do with Iron Man and Captain Marvel, or their love interests? I don't really know. XD.

Yeah but he was brainwashed, Cap wanted to help him. It was unconsiderate and slightly selfish, but it was totally in line with the character. He was losing (and lost, eventually) Peggy, i couldn't lost his best friend also. @Hugues de Payens: We were talking about relationships and then I mentioned the Cap-Bucky relationship.

@Elledy92: Yeah okay, But I still don't understand why it has to be so big part of the story in Civil War. Because it proofs that Cap cannot under any circumstances avoid to act underneath the Accords if the circumstances require it.