Thread:CirUmeUela/@comment-27496405-20180307074410/@comment-26838855-20180315070804

Marvelous 345678 wrote: That ambiguity of morality is what I liekd from Jessica Jones 2 and Black Panther, come on, it is your mother you are talking about, I can relate to Jessica... They really did such a good work with her character, I could see a great development. I actually loved the season, it wasn't boring, it was just really strong and different from Season One, after the nightmare is over (Kilgrave) we could really see the real personality of some... I just loved it. I cannot complain. It was such a masterpiece. It was sad but I put myself on Jessica's role and damn, that made fell in love with the story arc.

Does someone we love make us blind when it is about doing the right thing? They did something similar in DD2 but in this it worked bettr because it is your family... I dunno I iust fell in love with it. I'm glad you liked it! Just didn't particularly work for me, I feel like I've seen people struggling with parents a lot before. Marvelous 345678 wrote: BINGO! This description of the Avengers' arrival in Wakanda, which was obtained from a visit to the set, describes that Banner returned to Earth after THREE YEARS, we are a year ahead of Ragnarok, 2018 confirmed. Source

Also it says that Barnes and Rogers meet after years... we know it is "two years"

-A year since Ragnarok -Couple of years since Civil War -Three years since Age of Ultron

Thus, early 2018 confirmed. I wouldn't say confirmed because it's not direct quotes, just a set report, it could be the author just assuming. But sounds good, and thanks for finding that! We also have this, apparently Sam calls Bucky a "100-year-old man". Now, that doesn't really mean anything, it could very easily be rounded (they had the line about being roughly 100 in Civil War), but Bucky is exactly 100 from March 2017-March 2018, so that would work strictly, but if it's slightly after, you could very easily take it as Bucky's actually 101. CirUmeUela wrote: I really enjoyed JJ Season 2, but I agree that Season 1 was better. I was worried that Kilgrave wasn't actually going to show up because it wasn't until Ep 11, even though we knew he was going to be. Also really liked how it directly referenced Civil War with that one thing, and Captain America in several places.

I have a few questions BEJT, is Doctor Strange now finished in it's new spots? Is Black Panther finished as well? And can we confidently say that everything else, including Civil War, TV shows, etc, is all set now in 2016? Doctor Strange I have been working away at. Now that it's all over I'll tell you that I have recently had my 18th birthday (rather not say the exact day) and have been busy with that and exams. I'm out the other side now, and Doctor Strange is very nearly done. While the specified evidence given would suggest the film starts in like October 2015 and the rest of the film goes from February 2016-December 2016, the timespans given would suggest that the film goes from February 2016-April 2017ish. Once the maths has all been done today, my guess is that it will come out as approximately opening scene December 2015, crash February 2016, argument with Christine April/May 2016, arriving in Kamar-Taj May/June 2016, training through February 2017, climax February 2017. Very nearly there.

Everything else's placements are done, except Jessica Jones: Season 2, where I have to finish my notes. CirUmeUela wrote: And as for AoS's 100th episode, I know Coulsen was being tricked by that illusion of Michael Peterson, but do you guys think we can take that flashback of Coulsen on the operating table as canon, minus the fact that Michael Peterson was there? The mention of Stark is interesting. Could this mean that Tony paid for his immediate medical treatment after being stabbed? Because it would seem he was dead before any doctors had the chance to get to him. Still, I suppose it's possible that this flashback was right before he died, and before Fury decided to use TAHITI to revive him. That way Tony Stark wouldn't have known about TAHITI. Or it's possible this flashback, if real, was from part of TAHITI, suggesting that Tony Stark did now about it? This is less likely, but Jeff Loeb did say that Coulsen being alive in the MCU would be resolved in a surprising way as far as if the Avengers know or not. Still, it's possible this entire flashback is a false memory and was completely fabricated by the fear dimension. What do you guys think? I noticed that as well. I wonder if they were planting a seed to explain something further later on, or if that was it for their "Do the Avengers know?" explanation, because it wasn't very clear. I think the dialogue probably was real, there was no specific reason why it should just be due to the fear. Marvelous 345678 wrote: I loved this season, I have to see Season One to see which one is better as it has been like 3 years since the first was released ans I haven't watched since.

Doctor Strange is being done here. And yes! Everything is staying in 2016. At least, BEJT is changing his mind, Civil War and all the rest is firmly set in 2016. Nothing will be moved but possibly Phase One and Two, expect AoU and Ant-Man.

I think that Stark might show up in Season Five finale. Well, Doctor Strange will not all be in 2016, as explained above. But yeah, everything's placed firmly (might just check Ant-Man against the Ant-Man and the Wasp Prelude and that whoever placed Avengers: Age of Ultron got the time zones right but otherwise).

I really wouldn't get my hopes up about an Avenger showing up in the Season 5 finale, especially Stark. Robert Downey Jr. is unbelievably expensive, it would probably cost them like a whole season's budget just for a 10-second cameo.