Thread:Uskok/@comment-25565151-20141201084851

Apologies if my edits were not conductive to improving the quality of the wiki and the information it presents. I'm new to editing this particular wiki but I've attempted to be fair and moderate in engaging in a discussion on the subject in related forum posts and comments threads. If editing pages to represent only officially verified information per my best interpretation of the wiki's posted policies on conjecture, neutral point of view, and sourcing is counter-productive, may I humbly inquire how you would suggest I might most effectively engage in a productive dialogue on the subject? 