Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24467536-20140314030724/@comment-2041242-20140316105820

No, what you are trying to do is asking for a source where it is not needed. ANd place arrogant and disrespectfull reactions when you are told they are not needed.

And you have not only been arrogant and disrespectfull to me (and thane) in this thread, but I have noticed your arrogance alot, even against our admins and your lack of respect and arrogance towards other people. Call it a personal attack, or think about it and try to change it ;).

If you have read what I have typed time on time again, you should know there is no need for a source on this matter.

And Again, I am not sharing my OPINION, i am sharing a FACT. I like how you ignore a fact asking for a source when not needed.

Why do you need to know if he would have done it if he wasn't under mind controle? It doesn't change the fact that is was a rape. so why continu to ask for a source?

Let me change the mindcontrole in to a gun.

-Person X forces Person Z to have sex with her, while placing a gun on his head.

-Person Z would have had sex with person X if the gun was not there, placed on his head.

-But the gun WAS placed there on the HEAD. Which means he was FORCED.

-And since HE was FORCED it doesn't matter if he would have had sex with her without the gun. It is a rape, since HE was forced.

But, I realise you will propably not agree with this, again placing your own opinion above the law (Which I happen to know alot about with 2 judges as father and mother, a sister who studys law and me having had a part of the law in my study)