Thread:Zippertrain85/@comment-26095292-20160117022213/@comment-26095292-20160117074225

Nurdboy42 wrote:

Zippertrain85 wrote:

Nurdboy42 wrote: Why would they include the Mutants at this point when they've already set up the Inhumans to be their replacement? Because they're not the replacement. God, why does everyone think this? Kevin Feige and Marvel Studios have openly admitted they want them all of the Marvel properties in the MCU, including the X-Men. That Inhumans are in no way going to replace the Mutants in the universe.

At most the Inhumans are a substitute for Mutants. At most. Really? Have you been watching AoS? The stuff they're doing sounds VERY much like the kind of stories the X-Men would be involved in. This has been debunked so many times

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2014/03/13/inhumans-wont-be-substitutes-for-mutants-in-the-marvel-cinematic-universe


 * For anyone concerned about that path, you can take a deep breath. Marvel Studios president  Kevin Feige recently spoke with  Huffington Post and tackled the issue very specifically. In response to a question about whether the Inhumans would be used to get around the "m" word, Feige replied, "As it relates to Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver? No. No, no, no."