Thread:Mister Explicit/@comment-24669364-20170310004014/@comment-26838855-20180819113504

Deadpooled123 wrote: Avengers 4 lineup! :D Deadpooled123 wrote: The photo was outlining the heroes that survived the Thanos snap. Not sure why someone had to delete it....... Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: No one deleted it. I can still see it. But it's also not relevant a discussion of a timeline? Marvelous 345678 wrote: You cannot upload photos unrelated with the MCU productions. Deadpooled123 wrote: It is relevant, l posted it up for the sake of determining who would be a Skrull WinterWolverine wrote: And who is a Skrull is not relevant to the timeline. BEJT wrote: We do often get a little sidetracked into not talking about the timeline, usually just within long messages about mostly timeline-related stuff. It's good to try and keep this timeline-focused though. Mister Explicit did create the "Casual" thread a while ago to discuss non-timeline-related stuff. It didn't get used too much but it could be used again.

Did you upload the image to the wiki? Because since it was an edit of a bunch of photos and not a screenshot/photo actually for the wiki, then uploading it wasn't the best thing to do because it was going to get taken down. If you're posting an image that's an edit or something like that, try to link it instead or embed it.

(And I don't think anyone significant is a Skrull, I think the Skrulls will only be a very minor part of Avengers 4 if they even appear at all, because Avengers 4 is the ending of the culmination of 11 years of storytelling and has so much going on already that I don't think characters they introduced only 7-8 weeks prior will be relied on as a big part of the story.) Deadpooled123 wrote: I completely disagree with you on all ends BEJT because if the Skrulls are minimal, they will be wasted in this regard. Are you seriously begging for a repeat with the villain characters in Thor: The Dark World because it seems you're leaning to this preference more than anything. The Skrulls will play a good amount of significance in A4 as Sam Jackson has stated he's understood why Captain Marvel is released so soon prior to A4 (in their relation in a supposedly 24 year gap in the MCU Timeline). Marvelous 345678 wrote: It is not important for the Timeline Thread. I am very sure that the Skrulls are going to be minimal on Avengers 4, will be a minor situation being more important Thanos' story. Deadpooled123 wrote: We've already established the picture wasn't vital to the Timeline thread....

Has anyone seen Rogue One? That movie slotted the gap prior to A New Hope, not an overly important film but was extremely vital to explaining the events prior. This is what will happen with Captain Marvel displaying such questions as:

What exact year is Captain Marvel set in during the '90's? Where has Captain Marvel been this whole time? Why is Captain Marvel released before Avengers 4 when it's place in the timeline is the 1990's?? How will Captain Marvel and A4 link together through the Quantum Realm?

If there are any minor stories in the MCU, they normally shifted to television statuses such as Inhumans. Captain Marvel obviously has a MAJOR implication on how the events of Avengers 4 will play out and Avengers 4 makes more sense to be a story about dealing with the consequences of Thanos's snap rather than Thanos himself. Having an repeat of more heroes against Thanos seems reptitive and boring. The Skrulls will have a huge impact on A4 especially when you have to regard that one of the surviving heroes has manipulated events to go accordingly as specific likewise to mere coincidences. Avengers 4 is concluding a premise of 22 films and with Captain Marvel being 21, it will be the film closest post Infinity War addressing it's events to solve a part of A4. If you're going to use infiltrators being Skrulls and waste them, it seems VERY POINTLESS... Think of Mission Impossible with the face swaps, just that Captain Marvel will contain harder comprehension of whose who!

Point being: If the Skrulls are minor in A4, Captain Marvel will be minimal as well being a waste. There's a lot of explainations that film will intertwine with being AoS seasons, Avengers films, Civil War etc. BEJT wrote: I'm going to reply to this on the Casual thread. Resuming this thread to continue the conversation about the Skrulls from the Timeline Discussion.

Deadpooled123 wrote: I completely disagree with you on all ends BEJT because if the Skrulls are minimal, they will be wasted in this regard. Are you seriously begging for a repeat with the villain characters in Thor: The Dark World because it seems you're leaning to this preference more than anything. The Skrulls will play a good amount of significance in A4 as Sam Jackson has stated he's understood why Captain Marvel is released so soon prior to A4 (in their relation in a supposedly 24 year gap in the MCU Timeline). I'm not begging for a repeat of the Dark Elves, I'm not sure what gave that impression. I just don't think the Skrulls will be a major part of the story of Avengers 4. They might appear a bit and maybe one person turns out to be a Skrull but I don't think they'll be a major part of the film. Doesn't mean that they can't be a major part of films further down the line, such as Avengers 5.

Samuel L. Jackson was likely referring to Captain Marvel's introduction and the Quantum Realm and things, and yeah, probably also the Skrulls. Because I wouldn't be surprised if they show up. But I do not think they will be a huge part of Avengers 4 because there's not space for them and it's a sidetrack from the main focus of the storyline and it would be weird for such a major race to be introduced and then their main storyline dealt with all within 7-8 weeks. I don't think Marvel are in a rush with the Skrulls.

Deadpooled123 wrote: We've already established the picture wasn't vital to the Timeline thread....

Has anyone seen Rogue One? That movie slotted the gap prior to A New Hope, not an overly important film but was extremely vital to explaining the events prior. This is what will happen with Captain Marvel displaying such questions as:

What exact year is Captain Marvel set in during the '90's? Where has Captain Marvel been this whole time? Why is Captain Marvel released before Avengers 4 when it's place in the timeline is the 1990's?? How will Captain Marvel and A4 link together through the Quantum Realm?

If there are any minor stories in the MCU, they normally shifted to television statuses such as Inhumans. Captain Marvel obviously has a MAJOR implication on how the events of Avengers 4 will play out and Avengers 4 makes more sense to be a story about dealing with the consequences of Thanos's snap rather than Thanos himself. Having an repeat of more heroes against Thanos seems reptitive and boring. The Skrulls will have a huge impact on A4 especially when you have to regard that one of the surviving heroes has manipulated events to go accordingly as specific likewise to mere coincidences. Avengers 4 is concluding a premise of 22 films and with Captain Marvel being 21, it will be the film closest post Infinity War addressing it's events to solve a part of A4. If you're going to use infiltrators being Skrulls and waste them, it seems VERY POINTLESS... Think of Mission Impossible with the face swaps, just that Captain Marvel will contain harder comprehension of whose who!

Point being: If the Skrulls are minor in A4, Captain Marvel will be minimal as well being a waste. There's a lot of explainations that film will intertwine with being AoS seasons, Avengers films, Civil War etc. Rogue One was made after A New Hope, and also isn't vital to watch for A New Hope - for 39 years, A New Hope existed without it and was still great. The opening crawl of that film tells you what you need to know, Rogue One was made to retroactively expand on that, but it's not vital.

I'm not saying it will be a minor story in the MCU, I think it will be major, just not yet. It's very fast to introduce them in Captain Marvel and then 7-8 weeks later make them a major part of Avengers 4. I'm not saying the film will be them vs. Thanos for the whole thing but there could be all sorts going on with different realities or different times and planning and dealing with the aftermath and who knows what else they're hiding. I just don't think we're going to get more than 15 minutes of Skrulls in Avengers 4, since it's a follow-up mainly on Infinity War and making the Skrulls a major part is a massive new story aspect.

I assume you're referring to Doctor Strange's plan when you mention a character manipulating events to go a specific way, although he didn't survive. I don't really get how Doctor Strange's plan would mean Skrulls.

Again, I don't think they're wasting them, I just don't think they're in a hurry to use them in a major way yet. I still think Captain Marvel will be a major part of the film.