Thread:Marvelous 345678/@comment-26838855-20170701032609/@comment-26838855-20170707192127

Marvelous 345678 wrote: BEJT wrote: Marvelous 345678 wrote: Feige's statement implis 4 years... or 3 1/2 years xD IT IS EVIDENCE It always is. Certainly implies Iron Man's not 2010, and I've got it down

Yes! I think that Feige has not seen that timeline Carroll made because it contraditc everything Feige and CIA have said over the last 6 years Yeah exactly. It doesn't fit any timeline to have that but oh well, I think he was on the spot and he just did his maths a little wrong.

CIA?