Thread:Lady Junky/@comment-27837351-20190303005130/@comment-2153169-20190303031529

Hi :)

So, first of all, thanks for taking the time to explain me the issue :) Much appreciated.

However, I do think you're wrong in your reasoning; no matter how the issue is being addressed. You only have one source, and that's the one you showed to Ushok.

If you give a complete reading to the Deadline article, it mentions that "The Hollywood Reporter was first to report Schaeffer’s hire.", which is your first source. Basically, this sentence means they made their article based on the one from THR, and so that their info comes from them.

At the end of the day, it means that you don't have two sources, but only one. The "second source" is just the first one used in a different article. Same thing.

Based on what Ushok told you when you asked him, one source is not enough. And it'd be better if we wait a source by Disney and/or Marvel. So, I'm sorry but I do think I was right to delete that "The" until we get clearer source. We'll see what Shabook says :)

Also, while you're here, I'm going to ask you to stop pretending things about me to Shabook :) From what I can tell here, I did gave you a "source" to the reason why I removed that "the" (aka the answer Ushok gave you). So, there is no need to go complain that I "constantly removes "The" from the title on the page in the opening paragraph without solid reasoning, and is overlooking the two provided sources" :)

Thank you :)