Thread:BEJT/@comment-31677408-20190428023457/@comment-26838855-20190523033815

Marvelus wrote: It was a pretty creative idea... But they ruined it. I loved the creative, non-conventional, and more scientific time travel rules. It's a shame that it's become a mess.

Branfan87 wrote: I'm still confused. Is Loki 2012 still alive, or did he and Infinity War Loki share the same fate? Marvelus wrote: We can't know. Yeah exactly. a) That timeline should really be erased anyway but likely isn't, and b) No way of knowing what happened after 2012 and thus if he's alive in 2023 of that timeline.

235210b wrote: I think he is alive but we do not know where or more importantly when the Loki Disney Plus series is going to take place Marvelus wrote: It has already been said it is in the past of the main timeline... However, they could be lying. If the Series is about Loki from the new timeline, I wouldn't watch it I don't believe that was 100% confirmed, but the most reliably sourced synopsis was that it would be his adventures through time interfering with events in history. Some people decided this meant time travel which was just weird to me because there is nothing there suggesting that, he's over 1000 years old and it sounded very much to me like simply the things he got up to on sneaky visits to Midgard (we know he has secret ways in and out of Asgard) over those years.

You really wouldn't watch it if it were in the branch timeline?

235210b wrote: did you hear what Marvel told Tom Holand about the funearl seane they told him that it was a wedding I think that was exaggerated for a joke. Obviously on the day he has to know it's a funeral to act mournful with everyone.

Branfan87 wrote: Lol. It would make sense for Marvel to lie. I mean the Russo Brothers lied about the true title of the movie when they assured fans that it wasn't spelled in Endgame. Marvel haven't made an announcement about Loki ' s premise so there would be no lie involved. However, because this synopsis was a report and not official, it's less likely that it's an intentional lie to cover up that it's set in the branch timeline, since the reporter does not work for Marvel and is reporting what they know the show is.

Marvelus wrote: ?

That is totally a different situation. Branfan87 wrote: I just hope that the realm of Asgard is involved and others such as Sif, Odin, and Heimdall reprise their roles. Idris Elba is done. He wanted out for a while and he's left it behind.

Anthony Hopkins is also likely done but who knows.

Jaimie Alexander is currently busy with Blindspot (hence her being missing in recent films), but I hope to see more of her soon.

Marvelus wrote: The Russos "did not lie". When they said the title wasn't Endgame was during a time where the title was not defined. So they did not lie There are contradictory reports about when exactly the title was announced. The Russos have flat out lied before though, or come extremely close without 100% lying because of a technicality.

But as you were kind of saying, the Russos have nothing to do with this.

235210b wrote: there is also goimg to be a WandaVision, FALCON AND THE WINTER SOLDIER, and HAWKEYE but the next three I am not so shore about ROCKET RACOON AND GROOT, LADY SIF (who we have not seen in a movie for a while), GAMORA AND NEBULA, which I would like to see Confirmed: All-but confirmed: Rumoured: Lightly rumoured: I haven't heard anything about Gamora and Nebula.
 * Marvel's What If...?. c. 2020.
 * Falcon & Winter Soldier or The Falcon and The Winter Soldier, Disney can't seem to decide what it's called. c. August 2020.
 * Loki. c. 2021.
 * WandaVision. c. 2021.
 * Hawkeye.
 * Lady Sif.
 * Groot and Rocket Raccoon.

Marvelus wrote: The caps are unnecessary... 235210b wrote: I coppied it ok Branfan87 wrote: Ok, they weren't being completely honest. They said that like a year ago. And who cares about caps because they're "unnecessary"? You're weird, lol. Marvelus wrote: Yeah. I am so weird. This is a bizarre conversation, I don't know how this happened.

235210b wrote: out of  WandaVision, Falcon and The Winter Soldier, Hawkeye, Rocket Racoon And Groot, Lady Sif, Gamora And Nebula, and Loki Disney Plus series which ones do you want to see happed the most

I want to see  WandaVision, Falcon and The Winter Soldier, Hawkeye, Lady Sif, Gamora And Nebula, and Loki. I like Rocket Racoon And Groot character in the movies but a series where one of the main characters can only say "I am Groot" woukd get annoying by the season finale, and  I do not think a Rocket Racoon And Groot series is a good idea After Endgame and especially now with the Zemo (and Agent 13) reports, Falcon & Winter Soldier/The Falcon and The Winter Soldier is definitely the one I'm most looking forward to.

Marvelus wrote: Only four are confirmed. The other ones are rumors. 235210b wrote: I know Branfan87 wrote: There should definitely be a Gamora & Nebula show which depicts their dark childhoods as well as a show about Sif. Marvelus wrote: Nah. What for? How does it contribute to the storyline? I think it could definitely contribute to their characters, except I feel like we know enough at this point. Comics detailing their past, constant discussion of them fighting as children and what happened to Nebula through her life, seeing them fight-training in Endgame, to then do a whole show makes it feel kind of redundant to have both.

Branfan87 wrote: Why are you so oppositional? I would like to see a version of Gamora and Nebula's childhood, even if it was animated. It would also be cool to see Sif in action with her own TV show, possibly addressing what happened to her between the events of TTDW and AIW and post Endgame. It would be cool to see a TV show about those characters. Who cares if it doesn't contribute to the current storyline, it doesn't have to. Black Widow is going to obviously be set in the late 1980s. Animated is only for Marvel's What If...?. There has never been a hint of any canon MCU content being animated.

I would love a Lady Sif show. I believe that when the rumour came out, it included the mention that Sif would've been shown to be exiled - presumably because "Odin" (Loki) didn't want the biggest threat to his reign around and so framed her.

If Black Widow were set in the late 1980s, Natasha would be about 2-5, so no.

The various rumours are: 1999-2000, c. 2005, c. 2006, 2009, and 2016 (but that one appears to be fake). It's quite possible it's some combination set from 1999-2006ish.

Marvelus wrote: We already saw what happened to Sif between TTDW and AoU. Have you seen Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.?

Black Widow will be in 21st century. For me. It wouldn't be cool. But againm that is me. I like Gamora and Nebula but a TV Show seems super unnecessary. Even more when there is comics set in the MCU about them. We don't know what happened between Who You Really Are and Thor: Ragnarok though.

235210b wrote: Yes, to Gamora & Nebula, and evern more yes to Sif Branfan87 wrote: Yep. 235210b wrote: but what was Sif up to AoU to persent See above.

Marvelus wrote: Vanished. 235210b wrote: I meant aside from being affected by the snap 235210b wrote: and are lady sif and valkyrie friends Valkyrie disappeared before Thor and Loki were born and Jaimie Alexander is younger than Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston so Sif is likely a little younger than Thor and Loki. So they never overlapped.

Marvelus wrote: No Branfan87 wrote: Omg. I really wanted Hela, Dormmammu, and Killmonger in the movie though. Out of all the rumored villains, I expected Hela to make some return, but oh well, I hope she returns in the future along with Killmonger, Dormammu and Red Skull. And Marvel please show us the Black Widow-Winter Soldier confrontation in her standalone movie. Assume you're talking about Endgame. You can't just stuff characters in endlessly if there isn't a story purpose and those sorts of people just cannot be put in. Plus a character like Killmonger wouldn't fit.

If they do show the encounter it would have to be 2009, which seems to be later than the film is set, but possibly.

Branfan87 wrote: My bad, that post is unrelated. 235210b wrote: yah you thimk I don't really get what's going on with this conversation.