Thread:Rodangizzardcrusher3/@comment-26687285-20160822213306/@comment-26687285-20161021171838

Rodangizzardcrusher3 wrote: The X-Men movies aren't like MCU movies. They don't really have a Kevin Feige. They have Kinberg, I guess but he doesn't really care about continuity.

Not to mention, James Mangold, the film's director, said that it was intentional for both The Wolverine and Logan to ignore most of the continuity of the previous films, including each other. I agree with him too. The "Wolverine Trilogy" is not really supposed to be an overarching story. it's not Wolverine 1, Wolverine 2 and Wolverine 3, they're three separate films featuring Wolverine.

Plus, if you watch DOFP, it makes sense. Hank compared the timeline to a a river current that always corrected itself. At the time, he's talking about Raven killing Trask, but you realize, that despite everything Logan did to fix the timeline, mutants are still on the edge of extinction. What if mutants are destined to die out? I get what you're saying but, i'm sorry, that's a load of sh*t and Kinberg knows it. The whole point of DoFP was to show that destiny ISN'T absolute!. Raven DIDN'T end up shooting Trask and the future WAS actually preserved at the end. You cannot spend an entire movie showing me that destiny can be (and clearly has been) changed, and then turn around and tell me to forget all of that just because you want to do an X-Men 2 greatest hits. In the words of Classic Flix's Jay: I am not stupid, learn how to write!.