Thread:Shabook/@comment-24669364-20161014205608

Hi, Shabook. It's me, Mister Explicit (but you can call me Ex). I take it you are doing splendid today - so now that the pleasantries are out of the way, I' wish to take a few minutes of your time so we could discuss something. Don't worry, I don't want to spark an argument by any means because I discourage negativity, but I was hoping we'd reach a middle ground once this is over.

I'd like to talk about the Battle of Washington, D.C. article. Firstly, I would like to apologize if my edits caused any discomfort. I think my explanation for changing the page was somewhat misinterpreted - what I meant by "no one rewrote the page" was that I figured that because no one rewrote it, I'd rewrite it myself. But in the middle of my edits (which took 15 minutes to A: Watch the fight on YouTube in order to submit information and B: To recheck spelling and grammar errors and such) there was an edit conflict. Said edit conflict was you reverting the page back to it's original state, which I kinda felt a bit down after because it made my 15 minutes seem irrelevant.

I feel that you may have misunderstood the message for changing the battle section - and besides, I didn't really feel that it was necessary for there to be every meticulous detail anyways. And partially, I'm at fault for describing my reasoning for changing the page. Regardless, if you felt that my edits were supposed to represent contributions of bad faith, please don't because it wasn't my intention. I hope you understand.

I'm sorry, once again if my edits were of some inconvenience, but I hope we have the situation resolved now. (smiley face) I just wanted to put my two cents in on the matter. Thanks for reading/ 