Thread:CirUmeUela/@comment-27496405-20180307074410/@comment-2112031-20180708163154

Marvelous 345678 wrote:

Yeah... There is not going to be a timejump of YEAR between Infinity War and Avengers 4. Why? Peter got dusted, but some of his friends may have not and Parker will be having again his scholar year as usually.

Plus, the Avengers, the Earth's Mightiest Heroes, would have not found Thanos and they will have do nothing in months. Yeah. That sounds right.

Stark looks older, stress and not sleeping can do that. Believe me. But Ant-Man does not look older, neither does Captain America. And the Russos have alreadt talked about it months ago. Both movies are consecutive. Maximum months between them. But short enough to have Peter ready for July's vacations. It's practically been confirmed at this point that there's going to be time travel shenanigans that will result in the snap never happening. Cassie has been recast with a teenage actress and some of the stuff I've read indicates that the movie will feature Tony and Pepper having a son named Morgan. If any of this is true, then the movie has to take place at least a couple of years after Infinity War, enough time that Cassie is a teenager, but not enough to significantly age the surviving heroes.

But, I fully admit that I could be wrong, maybe it's all just rumours made to deliberately keep the real plot a secret, we'll see.

Marvelous 345678 wrote:

Adding more to my reasoning,ng, the Russos said that Banner has been the Hulk for TWO years by the time Infinity War takes place. If maths have to be useful. This would help to Infinity War calculations. I'm not sure that would help, since that would mean that Infinity War takes place in 2017, two years after Banner became the Hulk in Age of Ultron.

I'm not sure what the source is, but if the Russos said that, then I'm pretty sure they just made a mistake, especially since they've also affirmed that Civil War happened two years before Infinity War.