Thread:Rodangizzardcrusher3/@comment-26687285-20161222013026/@comment-25692211-20170325150323

Marvelfan94 wrote: Oh come on, I really doubt people would see this as ripping off the MCU. They could just imply that he died in the Westchester incident. They wouldn't even have to show it. But my point was that it would've made the film alot more melancholic by killing off this really upbeat, charming character who has become one of the franchise's main sources of comedic relief. And it would take away perhaps the biggest "easy fix" in that universe because then you could no longer say: "Just get Quicksilver to do all the work!".

Given that he'd be nearing his 80s by the time Logan took place, he might as well be dead anyway. I think the only one of the 70s/80s Apocalypse team who could justify being alive was Mystique, since First Class establishes that she ages half the rate of a normal human, meaning she'd be physically late forties despite being in her 90s.

Also, in Days Of Future Past, when Logan meets young Quicksilver, he notes that he wasn't so "young", implying that Peter was either less humorous or not as fast, meaning the "QS fixes everything" trope may not apply anyway.

No I didn't. But I don't know, I've already seen so much of this year's DC outings that I'm probably gonna end up avoiding these. Plus, as I've mentioned a few times before, I'm not even sure if I'm gonna go see them when they're out, because of my lackluster experience with BvS. I might rent SS at some point, and I would like to see the DCEU redeem itself. But currently, I'm very on the fence about the whole thing.

I know I'm definitely avoiding Wonder Woman, but I think I'll just see Justice League for the sake of it. The only two films I'm actually looking forward to are Man Of Steel 2 (especially considering who may be directing it) and Aquaman (isn't it ironic that the most hated superhero DC has ever created is the only one who's film is currently not a disaster in the making)