Thread:Shabook/@comment-24675861-20160221201017/@comment-112155-20160221203640

Two different circumstances.

Mantis was not created because nobody did it, there was not other reason. What I consider rather silly is to create an article for a Lego character knowing it is going to be moved to the parent article, as usual with videogames. Why not add it there in the first place?

Magus was created using the same sources that first announced that Daniel Bruhl's role was going to be Baron Zemo, and that some people around here fanatically edit-warred refusing to believe it, until time put everything in its place, as it always do. Why should we consciously trip twice over the same Stone? Or more than twice in some cases...

What must be done with Magus is to be very careful and avoid that anyone places every bit of internet speculation and/or info from the comics in the article. So I'm going to clean it and protect it, but I don't think it should be deleted unless other reliable sources prove it false.