Thread:Turtletrekker/@comment-112155-20140515212812/@comment-12522-20140516071458

No, I think I like it where it is. If anything, "Providence" should be a re-direct to a disambiguation.

And Shabook, I feel that I have to honest with you about this. Even before I was an Admin, I really couldn't have cared less about your "Naming Conventions" page and now that I am an Admin, my opinion really hasn't changed. In fact, before you went on your sabbatical, I had reached the point to where if you had thrown your "Naming Conventions" page in my face one more time, I was going to commit an act of violence against my computer.

Nobody else made contributions or suggestion to the page. No Admins, no other contributors-- other opinions and suggestions were never even sought out. You just wrote it up one day and expected everyone to follow suit. Frankly, I consider the page to consist of "guidelines" rather than "rules", and I do not consider myself nor anyone else here to be bound by them.

Consistency is nice, but I do not believe in absolutes. Every article is different. So what if the use of a name isn't 100% consistent with another article? What's gonna happen? Are people going to point and laugh? Who cares?