Thread:Marvelous 345678/@comment-26838855-20170701032609/@comment-26838855-20170725154401

Marvelous 345678 wrote: Hey mate!

Are you feeling good? I feel you like you are having a bad time. also I didn't see the Phase One re-order. Sorry for my relative absence in the last few days, I swore to myself that I would not reply/apologize again until IT WAS DONE. And I'm happy to say that, despite some extra work that needs to be done (explained at the beginning), THE BLOG IS READY TO BE READ!!!

Find it here: User blog:BEJT/Full Analysis of All Evidence for Phase One's Timeline, Plus New Suggestion for Timeline Placements

I know, it's 18 days late. There is several reasons for this: yes, life's a bit tough, thanks for asking mate, though I obviously won't go into that. As well as this, I've been incredibly busy (more than expected), there was a lot more work to do than I expected, I wanted to explain as much of it as possible, I've had laptop and internet problems, and it's all just been very difficult to balance my time. But yes, it's ready! I hope it's satisfactory.

Marvelous 345678 wrote: I was thinking that Marvel thought on having Homecoming on 2017, but it is definitely 2016, because they want to do a Harry Potter Saga, so we might have references to the Toomes' campaign being last year in Spider-Man 2 which is firmly in 2018. So we might do this: They might refer to Vulture fight against Spider-Man because he fought against him on the school year 2016-2017. And now Spider-Man 2 is just after the ending of 2017-2018 year and the beggining of 2018-2019 school year, sophomore year for Parker. So it works. If what you're saying is that with the school years, "last year" can refer to the last academic year, not the last calendar year, I definitely agree. Lots of people refer to it as such when referring to school, May 2018 can still refer to September 2016 as "last year" in school terms. Not ideal, obviously, but still.

Marvelous 345678 wrote: Charlie Cox said that he thinks six months has happened between the ending of Season Two and the beggining of Defenders. Now it fits better with Iron Fist being post Homecoming on late 2016.

Finn Jones also said Rand still have been 15 years out of the modern world which means Iron Fist and Defenders still happening on the same year

http://www.comingsoon.net/tv/features/870115-the-defenders-comic-con-interviews-heres-what-we-learned That quote is great, but I don't see where you're coming from with the post-Homecoming thing. If Defenders is indeed 6 months after Daredevil: Season 2, that puts it around May/June 2016, which lines up perfectly with Iron Fist if it does indeed position itself in February-March 2016, finishing on March 1st, and the Iron Fist's cast putting Defenders a couple of months later, again around May 2016. They line up very nicely. I hope Defenders works out.

Marvelous 345678 wrote: Captain Marvel will be set in the 90s, with Fury with both eyes and the Skrull will appear. Saw this - very excited about that. I wonder what it means for Captain Marvel's aging. But also, I wonder, will it be bookended by modern day like The First Avenger and Wonder Woman, placing it still chronologically roughly when it comes out, or will it be fully in the '90s? If it's fully in the '90s, it's now the first film in the timeline, which is cool, plus that solves the potential problem of the film coming out between the two, potentially back-to-back Avengers films. Still interested though as to what they will do about Ant-Man & the Wasp as well.

Marvelous 345678 wrote: At the Comic Con it is confirmed that Hulk has not been Banner for two years. From 2015 to 2017 makes sense Saw that as well, which is good to hear. Sounds like Ragnarok will pass through those first 2 years reasonably fast and the film will be set generally in a smaller amount of time around real time. I've also heard that the Infinity War trailer shows Thor seemingly soon post-Ragnarok. If the Marvel films are now following the notion that Civil War is 2017 (which is stupid), there could be references to it being "last year". However, that would work for us still if that's all they say, if it picks up soon after Ragnarok in late 2017, which also works for Spider-Man 2. It's possible. We shall see.

Marvelous 345678 wrote: James Gunn On Groot and His Growth:

Potential SPOILER for those of you who haven't watched Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 all the way to the end, and for those of you who don't want to know anything about the Infinity War trailer that played at San Diego Comic Con and at D23.

People are asking me a lot about how fast Groot grows, because in his appearance in the Infinity War trailer he was an ADOLESCENT (not a "teen" as has been reported in many places). This is exactly the same state of growth you see in the post credits scene of Vol. 2: Adolescent Groot.

In terms of how fast Groot grows overall, I can tell you this: Baby Groot appears two months after the Infant Groot we see at the end of Vol. 1. The post-credits scene with Adolescent Groot and Peter Quill is YEARS after the ending of Vol. 2. I won't say exactly how many years at this time, but be clear that it took him a fair amount of time just to go from Baby Groot to Adolescent Groot. (As a side note, I'll point out that Peter Quill can obviously understand what "I am Groot" means in the post-credits scene, so somehow he's learned to understand him in the same way Rocket has).

Like dogs, who grow at a different rate than humans, and spend a different percentage of their lives in adolescence than humans do, Groot and Humans do not grow at some exact exchange rate. So, although two months seems to be about two years (as Baby Groot seems to behave roughly like a two year old), it is not fair to assume that every month is a year to Groot. He has an alien biology and ages in a completely different way than a human being. Different aspects of his growth may take longer or shorter than a human's.

And, other than that, I'm going to leave you in suspense - frankly, for quite a while, as it will take years to show you how Groot goes from infancy to adulthood. I saw that. Nice to have confirmation. I moved it to Winter 2017 for now. It's the furthest point in the timeline at the moment.

And finally, to reiterate at the end here, the Phase One blog is up!!! I'm excited and proud, put a lot of effort into this. Here: User blog:BEJT/Full Analysis of All Evidence for Phase One's Timeline, Plus New Suggestion for Timeline Placements