Thread:Shabook/@comment-25179360-20171231221247/@comment-25179360-20180101195036

Policies can be broken, guidelines can be interpreted differently, etc. Guidelines are meant to simply be ideas that editors generally practice in order to make pages as coherent as possible. But by that logic they're not built to be followed with feverish loyalty, and sometimes can and should be broken or ignored depending on context, if doing so ultimately make the Encyclopedia better. Wikipedia explains it well.

I didn't know about Tina Minoru being different from the woman in Doctor Strange, and do remember the Wiki not too long ago claiming she was indeed the same person, thanks though for clarifying that. Keep in mind though this is why I reached out, that explanation was something that could've been stated in one sentence while undoing the edit. Then we wouldn't have had to get in this conversation in the first place.

It's not the fact you're undoing edits that irking me, it's that you don't even bother leaving explanations for why you did it in the first place. This has been a common occurrence for sometime here I think it's doing more harm than good.

Not trying to attack you, just some constructive criticism and feedback on the entire situation.