Thread:Shabook/@comment-26838855-20180403103459

Hi there Shabook,

This isn't really an issue yet, but I was wondering what to do about the agents (other than Fitz) who travelled to the future's ages.

Fitz is easy, because it's just like Steve and Bucky where the character was frozen so he has the physical amount of time his body has existed and then his body's actual biological age.

But for the other agents, those two things are equal. For both the physical amount of time their bodies have existed and their body's actual biological age, it is as if they skipped over 6 months.

The agents jumped to the future in the evening of a date that has been reasoned as May 12, 2017, though there is a leeway of a couple of days. They arrived back in the morning on December 4, 2017, from a hard date given in The Real Deal of it being "12-06-2017", backed up by further evidence. That's about 205.6 days. However, they only spent about 2.15 days in the future (some leeway up to about 1 more day). For them, it's basically as if their birthdays have jumped about 203-204 days.

So, on July 2, 2018, Daisy Johnson will be neither physically nor biologically turning 30. For both, she doesn't turn 30 until late January 2019.

On July 8, 2018, Phil Coulson will be neither physically nor biologically turning 54. For both, he doesn't turn 54 until late January 2019.

On September 11, 2018, Jemma Simmons will be neither physically nor biologically turning 31. For both, she doesn't turn 31 until early April 2019.

What's your suggestion for the age that appears in their infobox? While it would make sense to just keep saying "29" from July until January for Daisy for example, it will likely look like a mistake or that it hasn't been updated. My suggestion is that for each their age reads as "Biologically 29", "Biologically 53", "Biologically 30". It makes it clear that this is about their actual age, not just current date minus date of birth. 