Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24144012-20150916144041/@comment-9062114-20150917002251

Why wouldn't the reverse be true, that makes absolutely no sense, considering it would just benefit Sony when Disney could also be profitting. That's just now how business deals work, both sides have to have (close to) an even gain from something. No company would accept a deal where someone else can use their characters, but they can't use (most) of theres. Because it would be a totally biased deal.

Not to mention, just because nobody said the reverse is true doesn't mean we should assume it isn't, especially with the all evidence pointing towards it as well.