Thread:Uskok/@comment-6127681-20151012192632/@comment-6127681-20151012195627

I was accused of using original research to say he's alive, when all I was doing was saying one way or another whether he's alive or not is speculation. I did not put that Raza was alive on the page because I recognize that that is speculation and original research and has no place on the wiki. However, the opposite is true as well. Making a hard call (Deceased) on an ambiguous situation is in violation of policy and also counts as original research, which, I believe Shabook is guilty of. Again, to reiterate, my opinion is that Raza survived, but I keep that off the wiki to respect our rules on conjecture and original research, but I'm being accused of doing the opposite while Shabook makes a hard judgment call on a speculative situation, which has been noted as being speculative by wikians other than me both on Raza's comment section and on the Ten Rings page under the section "Kidnapping of Tony Stark". Shabook is accusing me of being guilty of policy violations when he's the only one who has done what he's claiming.