Thread:Shabook/@comment-26120199-20160317000811/@comment-26120199-20160317210303

Shabook wrote: Bonafide1022 wrote: You don't seem to be considering that my edits could be informational, writing them off as subjective and unverifiable.

Once there is a source that prove them wrong, what else is to be considered? Also, I wasn't the one who removed them the first time. I only acted when I saw you were starting to edit war and violated the Three-Revert Rule.

While I can argue about your source, I will still not engage in further discussion regarding the subject matter, hence my second paragraph, which you seem to not have read.

It was not my intention to provoke you in any manner, as I was merely acting under the belief that my actions were for the benefit of the wiki. Once again, I hope you will have a great day.