Thread:Twillight2/@comment-27496405-20190314174414/@comment-24126800-20190321064407

So, you fall back to insufficient lexical priority. Because I actualy deciphered the datas,and mines are thecorrect one based on simplicity,and lexical superiority.

You presented nothing aside lexicaly inferior sources like agents of shieldused as lexical superiority,and that's it. Once you'll have anything to argue for your side, come back again, until that suck up.

You until now refuse to listen and only cite inferior sources to your claims. Keep that in mind.

None of the movies contradict 2008. You simply CLAIM that, but cite no evidencefor that. Isay because there isn't any.So until you cite up something from the movies that'd contradict 2008, as you dodn't until now, your argument is invalid.