Thread:Murali9395/@comment-112155-20170515130545/@comment-112155-20170515131452

No, it's the opposite. We don't need a name in the image. We already have the name all over the article. What we need in the image is, well, an image... It's common sense.

Oh, and by the way, it's also a wiki policy:
 * Location images must be devoid of written labels with its name over the image, as they are intended to be an in-universe image of the location.