Thread:Shabook/@comment-3057070-20150207160344/@comment-3057070-20150207171930

Regardless of the age of the site, the size enforces the need for well documented and maintained standards. Hundreds of registered users and countless anonymous ones cannot be expected to follow word of mouth rules.

You seem to imply that challenges to the rules are bad, but isn’t debate and discussion the best way to improve? You pointed out that the former administrators had to be challenged to have the policies documented. You yourself were one of the three users in the linked wall post challenging the existing credits policy. Debate should be embraced, not considered to "happen in more occasions than they should."