User blog comment:KennyChief/S.H.I.E.L.D. is a UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT organization, not International./@comment-6127681-20151013043349/@comment-6127681-20151014122939

I'm afraid I don't understand what you're saying, my friend :/ "Because the reich isn't their enemy, just another party, and even when they want to dominate the world for them self, they are still part of the reich." - See, this sounds like you agree that HYDRA are Nazis, and it's a political dispute over leadership. I know that's not your position, but I don't know what you're trying to say here. "Why would Focke wulf make planes, ask them, HYDRA has nothing to do with them." - HYDRA has a lot to do with them. In a state of total war, HYDRA would be given jurisdiction over Focke-Wulf, because that's the purpose HYDRA serves as a special weapons division. We have proof of this too, HYDRA uses a prototype Focke-Wulf aircraft they could have got no other way other than if they essentially owned Focke-Wulf.

"And again, what they talked about was when, far before 1943, so before their split." Despite the fact that I feel I've provided overwhelming circumstantial evidence to counter this assertion, here you're simply mistaken. The scene Colonel Lohmer takes place in 1943, after the Battle of Azzano. At this point, HYDRA is still loyal to the Reich. Just read what Lohmer says. He talks about Nazi racial theory and his belief in the Reich's final victory.

"Just because HYDRA was a nazi organisation before 1943 doesn';t mean they are after. Just because some members might me nazi, doesn';t mean the organisation is Nazi." Yeah it kinda does. HYDRA was a branch of the fanatically Nazi SS, and just because the party collapsed in the wake of WWII doesn't mean HYDRA abandoned its philosophies; again, look at the historical precedents of ODESSA and also Werwolf.

"You can give so many examples, and so many "proof", but in the end Schmidt and HYDRA after 1943 is/was not a Nazi organisation." If you want to make solid counter-arguments, I welcome that, but at this point, you're just kind of in denial, or at least it seems that way without a counter-argument from you.