User blog comment:Rockman1216/The Fox Marvel dilemma/@comment-993964-20160105234835/@comment-9062114-20160109210133

''Ok what about Doctor Doom, he went from King of Latveria to anarchist hacker guy. Mystique is now a part of Charles Xavier's X-men, Cyclops is Havok's younger brother now in Fox's universe. Fox is really taking liberties with the established storylines and none of the Singer X-men movies or F4 movies don't even resemble an adaptation of a marvel comic story line. Lol dude, wake up and smell how Fox ruined the X-men movie franchise.''

So, in addition to your extremely limited knowledge of Disney/Marvel's business practices you don't even know what the content of their movies was? That alone could destroy the small amount of credibility to had in this debate.

The Fant4stic Movie did not have Doom as a "Anarchist, hacker" that was just a rumour and that never actually made it in. He was Victor Von Doom, a scientist from Latveria just like in the Comics. Granted, it was a totally botched version but the general idea of the character was the same. As for the other X-Men themes, it's the same thing. They might've changed the origin stories but the general idea of the character reminds. Try researching topics before you use them in the debate again :P

''Also that link you provided doesn't say anything about Feige's intentions about inhumans replacing the mutants (which they are in the MCU), he just said that Quicksilver and Wanda aren't inhumans. They still changed their origins to being enhanced by the teseract instead of being mutants and even in 616 universe, Quicksilver and SW aren't mutants anymore and retconned it http://io9.gizmodo.com/marvel-confirms-scarlet-witch-and-quicksilver-are-no-lo-1703112599 '' More cherry picking, out of context articles, and bullshitting, why am I not surprised? They changed them because they cannot add Mutants in the MCU, because as of the time of this posting Fox has the rights to them in live-action exclusively. Marvel didn't have much of a choice changing it, and using Inhumans as an alternative. Isn't Fox having the exclusive rights to Mutants in Movies what this whole debate was about? o.O

They were changed in Comics to make it more similar to the movies. Either you wish to admit this or not the movies are what draw in the big bucks, and it's not uncommon for the characters to change in other media based off of the blockbuster movie interpretation. Because that is the version the majority of the average fans recognize, and having them be Mutants and associated with the X-Men in the Comic Books and "Enhanced" Humans in the movies would do just that. Simple psychology.

''Why? Because Feige/Disney doesn't want the mutants as part of the MCU as long as Fox holds the rights. I mean there's so much evidence how can you not see it... http://www.businessinsider.com/its-astonishing-how-far-disney-is-going-to-bury-the-x-men-2015-4 '' Have you not read any points made in this entire discussion? LoL! Yes, as long as Fox prevents the Mutants from being the MCU, they will have a smaller influence in the Comic Books. Again, the movies are the big money makers and its clear Marvel/Disney ultimately influences them based off of the MCU movies stories and/or interpretations for average fans to understand.

But if Fox allows the Mutants to be in the MCU this would all change. Disney doesn't have the rights to Spider-Man, and only partially has them for The Incredible Hulk yet they have a huge part in the Comic Books and merchandising because they're in the MCU! The same thing would likely happen with the X-Men. There is blatant proof of this, no amount of pig-headedness and out of context articles will change the facts, sorry.