Thread:Shabook/@comment-2041242-20140907093013/@comment-24675861-20140909002109

I agree with Shabook's last two posts. Once yout have a category called "religion", then it will get separated further, like "occupation" did (but that was a good idea). That's why I say this is a slippery slope. I am newer that most of y'all and liked how things were.

Personally, I don't want that category, but if it helps the wiki...

I also agree that a policy needs to be established about categories, so newbies, and even old heads, don't just make them on a whim. I also think a pattern should be established about different groups of articles so that there is a consistency. My problem is locations and events.

Shabook and I discussed briefly (due to time constraints on my part) about how that problem can resolved (one is about the event; the other is more centric on the place). When I first started, he showed me how to focus a character article from that person's POV. I think ( my opinion) that a location should refer a reader to the event and not be a copy of the event itself, though the event happened there. Should the Hub article have the whole Battle for the Hub within it. IMO, no; but it should refer a reader there.

I think we need a meeting for the future of the wiki to establish consistency, so different types of articles all look different ways, but are consistant for that group (Locations all look the same as each other, but different than others).

Summary: I think we need a meeting...