User blog comment:Shabook/Original Characters vs. Comics Characters/@comment-4300738-20171010184031/@comment-4300738-20171010205353

I don't think I understand your reasoning. Mutants may not exist in the MCU, but that doesn't mean certain characters can't be based off them. Regardless, I don't see any reason why Mutant "Comic Counterparts" can't be mentioned here since they are, in fact, comic characters.

If the reasoning is to avoid X-Men or mutant related content, then that's rather one-sided because (a.) Who cares if it does or not? (b.) You're denying the possiblity that the writers could be creating MCU versions of characters they don't own, and  (c.) This is a personal blog that will presumably transition into it's own individual page detailing things related to the comics. I would think that would be an exception; it's not affecting what's established in the MCU since it's even saying Mutants exist.

As for the "team" thing, I'm also not understanding why that's an exception. That seems like an implied excuse based on the assumption that mutants can't be mentioned for whatever reason, unless they were apart of a comic team that the MCU has adapted because....the MCU isn't exactly like the comics? Wouldn't that defeat the whole purpose of this blog, then?