Thread:Murali9395/@comment-112155-20170515130545/@comment-2106279-20170515132835

Shabook wrote: No, it's the opposite. We don't need a name in the image. We already have the name all over the article. What we need in the image is, well, an image... It's common sense.

Oh, and by the way, it's also a wiki policy: I must have forgotten. My bad; most wikia's they use images with the name of the locations on them. I'll try replacing some of the existing ones here then.
 * Location images must be devoid of written labels with its name over the image, as they are intended to be an in-universe image of the location.