Thread:Twillight2/@comment-27496405-20190314174414/@comment-24126800-20190321111046

So, the conclusion remains: you don't present any evidence, obviously because you don't have any.

You AGAIN FALL BACK TO INFERIOR SOURCES (related comics), which you yourself admitted are irrelevant when it is overruled by the movies.

So get the fok off here you selfcontradicting pretentious liar.

And yes, AS I POINTED OUT, Spiderman: Homcumming contains a lot of contradictory datas both previous and later movies, thus the question with it falls back towether our only source of info is S:H or EVERYTHING ELSE. I say the solution is obvious.

Otherwise your link again falls back to inferior sources, like comics (your Holy Book: Fury's Big Week), Disney's Official Timeline.

The Iron Man 3 reference does not take acocunt how birthdays work, so Tony could take over the industry in 1992, there's no problem there. Otherwise the argument falls back agin to inferior sources, like DVD-commentary and interviews, so we canignore this whole nonsense, proven tofallon insufficient sources.

So, again it is crystal clearyou ignore anything I say,because YOU PREFERINFERIOR SOURCES INSTEAD OF THE MOVIES, aka.comics, interviews, extrenal materials. Your starting point is alwaysa shitty comicbook instead of the movies, namely Fury's Big Week.

Unless you're ready to make your case without falling back to inferior sources, which you yourself accepted as overruled by the movies themselves, just leave alone those who know what they're talking about, ok?